Cited by 101Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsSpam and Phishing Detection

Visual misinformation on Facebook

Yang, Yunkang, Davis, Trevor, Hindman, Matthew·2023·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Abstract We conduct the first large-scale study of image-based political misinformation on Facebook. We collect 13,723,654 posts from 14,532 pages and 11,454 public groups from August through October 2020, posts that together account for nearly all engagement of U.S. public political content on Facebook. We use perceptual hashing to identify duplicate images and computer vision to identify political figures. Twenty-three percent of sampled political images (N = 1,000) contained misinformation, as did 20% of sampled images (N = 1,000) containing political figures. We find enormous partisan asymmetry in misinformation posts, with right-leaning images 5–8 times more likely to be misleading, but little evidence that misleading images generate higher engagement. Previous scholarship, which mostly cataloged links to noncredible domains, has ignored image posts which account for a higher volume of misinformation. This research shows that new computer-assisted methods can scale to millions of images, and help address perennial and long-unanswered calls for more systematic study of visual political communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/joc/jqac051

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Y., Davis, T., & Hindman, M.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Hindman, Matthew
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2023-02-28
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
316-328
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W4322732716
Cited by
101
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2
FWCI
43.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
  • Institute for Data, Democracy & Politics at the George Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
Keywords
visual misinformation, political misinformation, Facebook, political communication, perceptual hashing, partisan asymmetry, engagement, 2020 elections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review