CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Social Media and PoliticsNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationMedia Influence and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet Use and Political Interest: Growth Curves, Reinforcing Spirals, and Causal Effects During Adolescence

Open access
Moeller, Judith, Shehata, Adam, Kruikemeier, Sanne·2018·Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1093/joc/jqy062
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study analyzes reinforcing spirals between online media usage and political interest among adolescents. By applying a two-dimensional conceptualization of online media usage that distinguishes between content and interactivity characteristics, the study focuses on the mechanisms and processes stimulating the long-term development of political interest during adolescence. Findings from a unique, six-wave panel study conducted in Sweden over a period of 5 years suggest that reinforcing spirals are driven primarily by non-interactive political information usages of online media. These results contribute to a better understanding of the factors leading to the development of political interest during a crucial life phase, as well as the growing body of literature that theorize media and selection effects as part of reinforcing processes during adolescence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/joc/jqy062

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple articles found that engagement with digital media increased political knowledge and that engagement with political content on social media increased political interest among adolescents.

    “Multiple articles found that engagement with digital media increased political knowledge67,70,72,74 and that engagement with political content on social media increased political interest among adolescents111.”

    From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

  • A range of articles found heterogeneity in effects for varying levels of political interest, political orientation and different characteristics of online content.

    “In summary, a range of articles found heterogeneity in effects for varying levels of political interest67,113, political orientation63,69,70 and different characteristics of online content111.”

    From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

  • Most authors, particularly those of the causal inference articles, explicitly emphasized the national, cultural, temporal and political boundary conditions for interpreting and generalizing their results.

    “Most authors, particularly those of the causal inference articles in our body of evidence, explicitly emphasized the national, cultural, temporal and political boundary conditions for interpreting and generalizing their results (see, for example, ref. 111).”

    From A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. Aarts, 2003, The divided electorate: Media use and political involvement, Journal of Politics,, 65, 759, 10.1111/1468-2508.00211 · DOI
  2. Acock, 2013, Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata
  3. Albacete, 2014, Young people’s political participation in Western Europe: Continuity or generational change?, 10.1057/9781137341310 · DOI
  4. Allison, 2009, Fixed effects regression models, 10.4135/9781412993869 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Allison, 2017, Maximum likelihood for cross-lagged panel models with fixed effects, Socius, 3, 1, 10.1177/2378023117710578 · DOI
  6. Arnett, 1995, Adolescents’ uses of media for self-socialization, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 519, 10.1007/BF01537054 · DOI
  7. Arnett, 2007, Handbook of socialization: Theory and research, 208
  8. Bakker, 2011, Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation, Communication Research, 38, 451, 10.1177/0093650210381738 · DOI
  9. Bennett, 2008, A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication, Journal of Communication, 58, 707, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bennett, 2009, Young citizens and civic learning: Two paradigms of citizenship in the digital age, Citizenship Studies, 13, 105, 10.1080/13621020902731116 · DOI
  11. Bode, 2012, Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 352, 10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Boulianne, 2009, Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research, Political Communication, 26, 193, 10.1080/10584600902854363 · DOI
  13. Boulianne, 2011, Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest, Political Communication, 28, 147, 10.1080/10584609.2010.540305 · DOI
  14. Boulianne, 2015, Communication and information technologies annual, 53, 10.1108/S2050-206020150000009003 · DOI
  15. Boulianne, 2015, Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research, Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524, 10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542 · DOI
  16. Brundidge, 2010, Political discussion and news use in the contemporary public sphere, Javnost—The Public, 17, 63, 10.1080/13183222.2010.11009031 · DOI
  17. Chaffee, 1997, Learning about politics from the mass media, Political Communication, 14, 421, 10.1080/105846097199218 · DOI
  18. Chaiken, 1989, Unintended thought, 212
  19. Dimitrova, 2014, The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data, Communication Research, 41, 95, 10.1177/0093650211426004 · DOI
  20. Ekström, 2015, Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement, Communication Research, 42, 796, 10.1177/0093650213476295 · DOI
  21. Ekström, 2018, Social media, porous boundaries, and the development of online political engagement among young citizens, New Media & Society, 20, 740, 10.1177/1461444816670325 · DOI
  22. Gil de Zúñiga, 2013, Expressive versus consumptive blog use: Implications for interpersonal discussion and political participation, International Journal of Communication, 7, 1538
  23. Gil de Zúñiga, 2017, Social media social capital, offline social capital, and citizenship: Exploring asymmetrical social capital effects, Political Communication, 34, 44, 10.1080/10584609.2016.1227000 · DOI
  24. Gil de Zúñiga, 2014, Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships, Journal of Communication, 64, 612, 10.1111/jcom.12103 · DOI
  25. Glenn, 1968, Aging, voting, and political interest, American Sociological Review, 33, 563, 10.2307/2092441 · DOI
  26. Hardy, 2005, Examining differential gains from Internet use: Comparing the moderating role of talk and online interactions, Journal of Communication, 55, 71, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02659.x · DOI
  27. Holt, 2013, Age and the effects of news media attention and social media use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?, European Journal of Communication, 28, 19, 10.1177/0267323112465369 · DOI
  28. Kim, 2013, Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2607, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005 · DOI
  29. Kruikemeier, 2017, News media use and political engagement among adolescents: An analysis of virtuous circles using panel data, Political Communication, 34, 221, 10.1080/10584609.2016.1174760 · DOI
  30. Kwak, 2005, Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement, Communication Research, 32, 87, 10.1177/0093650204271400 · DOI
  31. Lin, 2016, Differential gains in SNSs: Effects of active vs. passive Facebook political participation on offline political participation and voting behavior among first-time and experienced voters, Asian Journal of Communication, 26, 278, 10.1080/01292986.2016.1148184 · DOI
  32. Lupia, 2005, Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest, Journal of Politics, 67, 1122, 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00353.x · DOI
  33. Moeller, 2013, The differential role of the media as an agent of political socialization in Europe, European Journal of Communication, 28, 309, 10.1177/0267323113482447 · DOI
  34. Moeller, 2015, Spiral of political learning: The reciprocal relationship of news media use and political knowledge among adolescents, Communication Research
  35. Neundorf, 2013, Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood, Acta Politica, 48, 92, 10.1057/ap.2012.23 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Norris, 2000, A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies, 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI
  37. Petty, 1986, Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Pingree, 2007, How messages affect their senders: A more general model of message effects and implications for deliberation, Communication Theory, 17, 439, 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00306.x · DOI
  39. Prior, 2010, You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle, The Journal of Politics, 72, 747, 10.1017/S0022381610000149 · DOI
  40. Richey, 2015, Internet access does not improve political interest, efficacy, and knowledge for late adopters, Political Communication, 32, 396, 10.1080/10584609.2014.944324 · DOI
  41. Ritchie, 1990, Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships, Communication Research, 17, 523, 10.1177/009365090017004007 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Russo, 2017, Stability and change in youth’s political interest, Social Indicators Research, 132, 643, 10.1007/s11205-016-1302-9 · DOI
  43. Schemer, 2012, Reinforcing spirals of negative affects and selective attention to advertising in a political campaign, Communication Research, 39, 413, 10.1177/0093650211427141 · DOI
  44. Scheufele, 2002, Examining differential gains from mass media and their implications for participatory behavior, Communication Research, 29, 46, 10.1177/009365020202900103 · DOI
  45. Scott, 2017, Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults' social media use, Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 311, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026 · DOI
  46. Sears, 2003, Oxford handbook of political psychology, 60
  47. Sears, 1997, Politics matters: Political events as catalysts for preadult socialization, American Political Science Review, 91, 45, 10.2307/2952258 · DOI
  48. Shah, 2016, Conversation is the soul of democracy: Expression effects, communication mediation, and digital media, Communication and the Public, 1, 12, 10.1177/2057047316628310 · DOI
  49. Shehata, 2017, The development of political interest among adolescents: A communication mediation approach using five waves of panel data, Communication Research
  50. Sigel, 1989, Political learning in adulthood: A sourcebook of theory and research
  51. Slater, 2007, Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity, Communication Theory, 17, 281, 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. Slater, 2015, Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes, Media Psychology, 18, 370, 10.1080/15213269.2014.897236 · DOI
  53. Slater, 2010, The influence of youth music television viewership on changes in cigarette use and association with smoking peers: A social identity, reinforcing spirals perspective, Communication Research, 37, 751, 10.1177/0093650210375953 · DOI
  54. Song, 2017, Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization, Journal of Communication, 67, 256, 10.1111/jcom.12288 · DOI
  55. Strömbäck, 2007, Electoral cycles and the mobilizing effects of elections: A longitudinal study of the Swedish case, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 17, 79, 10.1080/13689880601132570 · DOI
  56. Strömbäck, 2010, Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest, European Journal of Political Research, 49, 575, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x · DOI
  57. Torcal, 2014, Revisiting the dark side of political deliberation. The effects of media and political discussion on political interest, Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 679, 10.1093/poq/nfu035 · DOI
  58. Vaccari, 2015, Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower-and higher-threshold political activities among twitter users in Italy, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 221, 10.1111/jcc4.12108 · DOI
  59. Valenzuela, 2016, Socialized for news media use: How family communication, information-processing needs, and gratifications determine adolescents’ exposure to news, Communication Research
  60. Van Deth, 1990, Continuities in political action: A longitudinal study of political orientations in three western democracies, 275, 10.1515/9783110882193.275 · DOI
  61. Weintraub Austin, 2001, The role of parental mediation in the political socialization process, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 221, 10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_2 · DOI
  62. Wells, 2017, When we stop talking politics: The maintenance and closing of conversation in contentious times, Journal of Communication, 67, 131, 10.1111/jcom.12280 · DOI
  63. Xenos, 2009, Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning, Political Communication, 26, 317, 10.1080/10584600903053569 · DOI
  64. Zukin, 2006, A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183177.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moeller, J., Shehata, A., & Kruikemeier, S.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam WV, The Netherlands
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Shehata, Adam
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Communication
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
1052-1078
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
DOI
10.1093/joc/jqy062
OpenAlex
W2905676831
Cited by
40
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor, 19 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
political interest, adolescents, online media use, political information seeking, media interactivity, political socialization, growth curves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review