Cited by 495Communication Studies and MediaFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsMedia Studies and Communication

Family Communication Patterns: Measuring Intrapersonal Perceptions of Interpersonal Relationships

Open access
RITCHIE, L. DAVID, FITZPATRICK, MARY ANNE·1990·Communication Research

Abstract

Mass communication researchers interested in family communication have traditionally assumed that family norms are shared by all family members, and apparent disagreement about family norms has been ascribed to instrument unreliability. A survey of 308 adolescent children and their parents, using a revised Family Communication Pattern (RFCP) instrument, yields evidence of systematic patterns of agreement and disagreement between mothers and fathers as well as between parents and children. Seventh-grade children are more likely to share their mothers' views on concept-orientation and their father's views on socio-orientation; by the 11th grade the opposité pattern holds. These results suggest that future work on family communication cannot ignore the influence of intrafamilial patterns of agreement and disagreement on communication norms defining the family.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/009365090017004007

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cronbach, Lee J. (1955), "Processes affecting scores on 'understanding of others' and 'assumed similarity'." Psychological Bulletin 52: 177-193.
  2. Good, Leslie (1983), unpublished master's thesis, University of Oregon.
  3. Mead, George Herbert (1934), Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Newcomb, Theodore M. (1953), "An approach to the study of communicative acts." Psychological Review 60: 393-404.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RITCHIE, L. D., & FITZPATRICK, M. A.
Venue
Communication Research
Published
1990-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
523-544
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2167989480
Cited by
495
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Communication Research (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication Studies and Media
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
family communication, family norms, parent-adolescent communication, parents, family communication patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review