The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State
Open accessAbstract
This article develops the concept of racialized burdens as a means of examining the role of race in administrative practice. Racialized burdens are the experience of learning, compliance and psychological costs that serve as inequality reproducing mechanisms. To develop this concept, we examine administrative burdens in the US state from the theoretical perspective of racialized organizations. Using examples from attempts to access citizenship rights—via immigration, voting and the social safety net—we illustrate some key points. First, racialized burdens combine control of access to resources and ideas about racial groups in ways that typically disadvantage racially marginalized groups. Second, while still promising fair and equal treatment, racially disproportionate burdens can be laundered through facially neutral rules and via claims that burdens are necessary for unrelated reasons. Third, racialized burdens emerge when more explicit forms of racial bias in policies or administrative practices become illegal, politically untenable or culturally unacceptable. Racialized burdens neatly carry out the “how” in the production of racial inequality while concealing, or providing an alibi for, the “why.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation
Sewell (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229967 · Cited by 5,282
Racial Formation in the United States
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9780203076804 · Cited by 3,510
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3121 · Cited by 2,721
Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2939044 · Cited by 2,657
Class, Citizenship, and Social Development.
Moore, W. E., Marshall, T. H., & Lipset, S. M. (1964) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091434 · Cited by 2,126
A Theory of Racialized Organizations
Ray, V. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418822335 · Cited by 1,994
Self-citation(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-2422 · Cited by 1,108
White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race
Mellinger, W. M., & Lopez, I. F. H. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655629 · Cited by 1,074
Cited by
Improving Older Adults’ Health by Reducing Administrative Burden
HERD, P. (2023) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12629 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray, V., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-29
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-152
- ISSN
- 1053-1858 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9803
- OpenAlex
- W4210401411
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 81.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jopart/muac001
- The paper
- Ray, V., Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. (2023). Racialized Burdens: Applying Racialized Organization Theory to the Administrative State. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.