Actualizing decolonization: a case for anticolonizing and Indigenizing the curriculum
Open accessAbstract
Calls to decolonize education systems cannot be removed from broader social struggles. Scholars have engaged in theoretical discussions on what decolonization entails, emphasizing the need for transforming thoughts, beliefs, and practices. However, the lack of sustained engagement and widespread resistance to decolonizing the curriculum remain evident, underscoring the urgency to envision new futures and explore relationalities between educators and students. In this article, we delve into the evolving terminologies surrounding decolonization, anticolonization, and Indigenization, emphasizing their pivotal roles in the broader project of educational decolonization. We argue that a reassertion of Indigenous resistance and futurity in higher education forms the cornerstone of this transformative process. Through an examination and understanding of these terminologies, we aim to contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding educational decolonization and envision inclusive, equitable, and anticolonial learning environments that centre on Indigenous knowledge and perspectives.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The notion of academic 'rigour' is often narrowly defined through a Western lens, leading to a systemic devaluing of Indigenous research methodologies and pedagogical approaches that prioritize relationality and context over decontextualized data.
“The very notion of academic 'rigour' is often narrowly defined through a Western lens, leading to a systemic devaluing of Indigenous research methodologies and pedagogical approaches that prioritize relationality and context over decontextualized data (Dei et al., 2024; Sioui, 2025).”
From Reclaiming Relational Pedagogies: The Role of Talking Circles in Decolonizing Higher Education Classrooms (2025) · cites this paper as Dei et al., 2024
Cites
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Wolfe, P. (2006) · Journal of Genocide Research · doi:10.1080/14623520601056240 · Cited by 6,491 · see citing works
Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., Surla, K. L., & Edwards, K. T. (2022) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211042423 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lacy, V. (2025) · Brock Education Journal · doi:10.26522/brocked.v34i2.1241 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sefa Dei, G. J., & Cacciavillani, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Social Justice Education , OISE, University of Toronto, 252 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON, M5S 1V6 , Canada
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cacciavillani, Alessia
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy of Education
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 209-226
- ISSN
- 0309-8249 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9752
- OpenAlex
- W4396600153
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 33.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Philosophy of Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Keywords
- indigenization, curriculum reform, indigenous knowledge, indigenous resistance, higher education, inclusive learning environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review