Cited by 38Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesGastrointestinal motility and disordersPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Maternal attributions for the causes and remedies of their children's abdominal pain

Open access
Claar, R.·1999·Journal of Pediatric Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine mothers' attributions for the causes and remedies of their children's abdominal pain, specifically whether attributions differed according to child diagnosis, reflected a dualistic or multidimensional view of pain, and changed following medical evaluation. METHODS: Mothers of children whose medical evaluation indicated peptic disease (n = 55) or unexplained pain without identifiable organic disease (n = 98) participated in telephone interviews prior to their children's medical evaluations and one year later. RESULTS: About half of the mothers in each group endorsed both psychosocial and physical factors as important in the etiology of their children's abdominal pain. Following medical evaluation, mothers in both groups tended to maintain their attributions regarding the importance of psychosocial factors. CONCLUSIONS: Many mothers acknowledged the contribution of psychosocial factors to their children's abdominal pain. They may be receptive to behavioral interventions if physicians present these remedies as an integral component of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jpepsy/24.4.345

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children's beliefs about their symptoms and the acceptability of interventions matter because they can predict whether a child will receive and benefit from treatment.

    “Child beliefs about the nature of their symptoms and the acceptability of interventions are also important because they may predict whether a child will receive and benefit from treatment.12,13”

    From Provider Communication Regarding Psychosocial Factors Predicts Pain Beliefs in Parent and Child (2016) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (pp. 8–9) says mothers’ beliefs about their children’s pain may help clinicians offer acceptable treatments and may affect families’ receptiveness to referrals. The claim instead concerns children’s own beliefs, and the paper does not establish that those beliefs predict treatment receipt or benefit. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dworkin, S. F., Von Korff, M., LeResche, L. L. (1992). Epidemiological studies of chronic pain: A dynamicecological perspective. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 3-11.
  2. Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The common sense representation of illness danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Medical psychology (pp. 7-30). New York: Pergamon.
  3. von Baeyer, C. L., & Bruce, G. (1994). Parents' attributions for pain and pain relief in children with recurrent abdominal pain. Poster session presented at the Third International Symposium on Pediatric Pain, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claar, R.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Claar, R.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
345-354
ISSN
  • 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-735X
OpenAlex
W2110223206
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD023264, HD23264)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
abdominal pain, children, illness beliefs, psychosocial factors, physical factors, peptic disease, unexplained abdominal pain, medical assessment, behavioral interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attitude to Health, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mothers, Abdominal Pain, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review