The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining the Psychological Consequences of Surviving Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review as a Research Method in Pediatric Psychology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a systematic review to determine the psychological consequences of surviving childhood cancer. METHODS: Searches were conducted using Psyclit, Medline, Cinahl, and Bids and articles selected on the basis of predefined criteria. Key information was extracted to data sheets and these were rated by two coders. RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified, seventeen from the United States. Survivors did not show deficits in measures of anxiety, depression, or self-esteem when compared with population norms or matched controls. Survivors of some cancers (bone tumors) have poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review support findings of previous descriptive reviews. Methodological problems include poorly reported medical information (for example, time since diagnosis), heterogeneous samples, self-selection of participants, poorly chosen/lack of suitable measures, and a lack of longitudinal work. Findings are discussed in terms of the need for cross-cultural work on adjustment to childhood cancer, the need for studies to take on a more developmental approach, and for greater national and international collaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Family coping with pediatric leukemia: Ten years after treatment
Kupst, M. J., Natta, M. B., Richardson, C. C., Schulman, J. L., Lavigne, J. V., & Das, L. (1995) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/20.5.601 · Cited by 200 · cited 9×
“There were three prospective studies (Kazak, Christakis, Alderfer , & Coiro, 1994; Kupst et al., 1995; Noll, Bukowski , Davies, Koontz, & Kulkarni, 1993), the remainder were cross-sectional.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThompson, R. J., Gustafson, K. E., George, L. K., & Spock, A. (1994) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/19.2.189 · Cited by 74
Cited by
Psychosocial care of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer and survivors
Zebrack, B., & Isaacson, S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.5467 · Cited by 462
Psychosocial Functioning in Pediatric Cancer
Patenaude, A. F., & Kupst, M. J. (2005) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsi012 · Cited by 414
Assessment of Parental Psychological Stress in Pediatric Cancer: A Review
Jantien Vrijmoet-Wiersma, C. M., van Klink, J. M. M., Kolk, A. M., Koopman, H. M., Ball, L. M., & Maarten Egeler, R. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn007 · Cited by 389
Family adjustment to childhood cancer: a systematic review.
Long, K. A., & Marsland, A. L. (2011) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-010-0082-z · Cited by 377
Bruce, M. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.10.002 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Eiser, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 449-460
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2137294739
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining the Psychological Consequences of Surviving Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review as a Research Method in Pediatric Psychology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpepsy/25.6.449
- The paper
- Eiser, C. (2000). Examining the Psychological Consequences of Surviving Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review as a Research Method in Pediatric Psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/25.6.449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.