The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Distraction Strategies for Venipuncture Distress in Children
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two pediatric venipuncture distress-management distraction strategies that differed in the degree to which they required children's interaction. METHODS: Eighty-eight 1- to 7-year-old children receiving venipuncture were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: interactive toy distraction, passive movie distraction, or standard care. Distress was examined via parent, nurse, self-report (children over 4 years), and observational coding. Engagement in distraction was assessed via observational coding. RESULTS: Children in the passive condition were more distracted and less distressed than children in the interactive condition. Although children in the interactive condition were more distracted than standard care children, there were no differences in distress between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite literature that suggests that interactive distraction should lower distress more than passive distraction, results indicate that a passive strategy might be most effective for children's venipuncture. It is possible that children's distress interfered with their ability to interact with the distractor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Birnie, K. A., Noel, M., Chambers, C. T., Uman, L. S., & Parker, J. A. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005179.pub4 · Cited by 755
Uman, L. S., Chambers, C. T., McGrath, P. J., & Kisely, S. R. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005179.pub2 · Cited by 472
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Pediatric Pain Distraction during IV Placement
Gold, J. I., Kim, S. H., Kant, A. J., Joseph, M. H., & Rizzo, A. ". (2006) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.207 · Cited by 391
Evidence-based Assessment of Pediatric Pain
Cohen, L. L., Lemanek, K., Blount, R. L., Dahlquist, L. M., Lim, C. S., Palermo, T. M., McKenna, K. D., & Weiss, K. E. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsm103 · Cited by 386
Self-citationPain Reduction During Pediatric Immunizations: Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
Schechter, N. L., Zempsky, W. T., Cohen, L. L., McGrath, P. J., McMurtry, C. M., & Bright, N. S. (2007) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1107 · Cited by 329
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- MacLaren, J. E., & Cohen, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 387-396
- ISSN
- 0146-8693 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2132486660
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Distraction Strategies for Venipuncture Distress in Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jpepsy/jsi062
- The paper
- MacLaren, J. E., & Cohen, L. L. (2005). A Comparison of Distraction Strategies for Venipuncture Distress in Children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsi062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.