Cited by 57Catholicism and Religious StudiesReformation and Early Modern ChristianityBiblical Studies and Interpretation

IGNATIAN PROBLEMS

BAMMEL, C. P.H.·1982·The Journal of Theological Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jts/xxxiii.1.62

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second Temple Jewish writers exhibit an "apocalyptic" demonology: an understanding of demons as refracted through Second Temple Jewish apocalyptic expectation.

    “Second Temple Jewish writers exhibit an “apocalyptic” demonology: an understanding of demons as refracted through Second Temple Jewish apocalyptic expectation.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BAMMEL, C. P. H.
Corresponding author
BAMMEL, C. P.H.
Venue
The Journal of Theological Studies
Published
1982-04-01
Volume
XXXIII
Issue
1
Pages
62-97
ISSN
  • 0022-5185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4607
OpenAlex
W4248950228
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 19
FWCI
11.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Theological Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Catholicism and Religious Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Ignatius of Loyola, Jesuit spirituality, spiritual exercises

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review