Doing Community-Driven Research: A Description of Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities
Open accessAbstract
Seattle Partners, an Urban Research Center (URC) funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is a partnership of community agency representatives, community activists, public health professionals, academics, and health care providers whose mission is to improve the health of urban Seattle, Washington, communities by conducting community-based participatory research. This article describes the development and characteristics of Seattle Partners. Using primarily qualitative methods, including periodic in-depth interviews, evaluators identified the components necessary for Seattle Partners to maintain a collaborative and establish a research center driven by community interests. Seattle Partners is run by an unrestricted and inclusive board that has spent 5 years developing both an operating structure and various research interventions. Operating under Community Collaboration Principles, the board identified social determinants of health as the priority area in which to work. Collaboration, "small and concrete" accomplishments, skilled individuals, and funder support directly influence the success of the center. Decision making, project selection, and board composition have all been challenges to work through. Learning how to do and sustain the work are lessons being learned as Seattle Partners matures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NIEHS endorses six principles for effective CBPR based on prior investigations and interactions with practitioners.
“On the basis of prior investigations ( 13-20 ) and interactions with practitioners ( 11 ), NIEHS endorses the following principles for effective CBPR:”
From Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences (2002) · cites this paper as [18]
The Introduction describes Seattle Partners bringing together community members, practitioners, and researchers, and the Abstract reports interviews used to identify components of a community-driven research partnership. These passages support the reference to practitioner interactions, which is where citation (11) appears, but they do not establish that NIEHS drew on those interactions to endorse six CBPR principles. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHistorically, communities have often been seen as cohorts rather than full partners in the research process.
“Historically, communities have often been seen as cohorts rather than full partners in the research process ( 11,16-18 ).”
From Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences (2002) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH: Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 · Cited by 5,893 · see citing works
Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care.
Gamble, V. N. (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.11.1773 · Cited by 1,263 · see citing works
Krieger, J. W., Song, L., Takaro, T. K., & Stout, J. (2000) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/bf02350962 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Sullivan M, Kone A, Senturia KD, Chrisman N, Ciske S, Krieger J. Researcher and researched-community perspectives: toward bridging the gap. Health Educ Behav. 2001; 28(2):130-149.
- Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667- 1676.
- Gamble V. A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9:35-38.
- Sullivan M, Kone A, Senturia K, Chrisman N, Ciske S, Krieger J. History of community- based research in Seattle. Health Educ Behav. 2000;28(2):130-149.
- Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage Publications; 1993.
- Krieger J, Castorina J, Walls M, Weaver M, Ciske S. Increasing influenza and pneumo- coccal immunization rates: a randomized controlled study of a senior center-based inter- vention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(2):123-131.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences
O'Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s2155 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Taliep, N., Bulbulia, S., Lazarus, S., Seedat, M., & Building Bridges Team (2022) · The Palgrave Handbook of Innovative Community and Clinical Psychologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71190-0_24 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eisinger, A.
- Affiliations
- Public Health – Seattle & King County (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisinger, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 519-534
- ISSN
- 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-3460
- 1471-8505
- PMC
- PMC3455909
- OpenAlex
- W2100446345
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Keywords
- community-based participatory research, urban health, social determinants of health, community collaboration, research centre governance, board composition, decision-making, community partnerships, public health partnerships, lessons learned
- MeSH terms
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Community-Institutional Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Data Collection, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Organizational Affiliation, Organizational Objectives, Social Change, Social Class, United States, Washington, Organizational Culture, Community Health Planning, Urban Health Services, Organizational Case Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review