Cited by 39Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthOccupational Health and Performance

The impact of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing on the partners of firefighters

Open access
Pfefferbaum, B.·2002·Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine

Abstract

This study explored the impact of the 1995 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, bombing on the spouses and significant others of a volunteer sample of Oklahoma City firefighters who participated in the bombing rescue effort. Twenty-seven partners of Oklahoma City firefighters participated in this study, conducted 42 to 44 months after the bombing. These partners were assessed using a structured diagnostic interview and a companion interview to examine exposure, rates of psychiatric disorders and symptoms, functioning, health, and relationships. Coping and perception of the firefighter partner's response were also examined. Some of the women were exposed directly; most knew someone who had been involved in the disaster, and all reported exposure through the media. The rate of psychiatric disorders in the women following the disaster was 22%, essentially unchanged from before the incident. One developed bomb-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Most were satisfied with their work performance; 15% reported that their health had worsened since the bombing, and more than one third reported permanent changes in relationships as a result of the bombing. Most coped by turning to friends or relatives, with less than 10% seeking professional help. Many described symptoms in their firefighter mate; all reported that their mate had been affected by the experience, and one half said their mate had fully recovered. The mates of these firefighters fared relatively well in terms of psychiatric disorders, symptoms, and ability to function. The prevalence of bomb-related posttraumatic stress disorder was considerably lower in this sample than in samples of individuals more directly exposed to the bombing, although some reported changes in relationships and health. The results suggest the need for further study of the impact of interpersonal exposure in those who provide support for rescue-and-recovery workers in major terrorist incidents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jurban/79.3.364

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alcohol consumption has been identified as one of the most prominent coping strategies used by firefighters in response to occupational stress.

    “Alcohol consumption has been identified as one of the most prominent coping strategies used by firefighters in response to occupational stress [95,96].”

    From The Cyclical Battle of Insomnia and Mental Health Impairment in Firefighters: A Narrative Review (2024) · cites this paper as [95]

    The Discussion reports that, among firefighters responding to the Oklahoma City bombing, alcohol use was the second most frequently reported coping measure after turning to friends or relatives. This supports its prominence in that disaster response, but not the broader claim about firefighters coping with occupational stress generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfefferbaum, B.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Pfefferbaum, B.
Venue
Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
364-372
ISSN
  • 0022-1503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-3460
  • 1471-8505
OpenAlex
W2035093894
Cited by
39
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice (MIPT106-113-2000-020)
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
  • Office of Justice Programs
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
Oklahoma City bombing, post-traumatic stress disorder, secondary exposure, media exposure, mental illness, coping, relationship change, occupational health, terrorist attacks, disaster recovery
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Disasters, Explosions, Female, Fires, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Oklahoma, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Urban Health, Spouses, Rescue Work, Terrorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review