Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drought Tolerance in Two Mosses: Correlated with Enzymatic Defence Against Lipid Peroxidation

DHINDSA, RAJINDER S., MATOWE, WANDEKAYI·1981·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

Drought-induced changes in the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase, level of lipid peroxidation, and membrane permeability (solute leakage) have been studied in two mosses, the drought-tolerant Tortula ruralis and the drought-sensitive Cratoneuron filicinum. In T. ruralis the activities of SOD and catalase increase during slow drying. The level of lipid peroxidation consequently declines. On subsequent rehydration the enzyme activities decline and the level of lipid peroxidation rises gradually to normal levels. The leakage of preloaded 86Rb on rehydration of slowly dried T. ruralis is similar to that in turgid moss, i.e. leakage of about 20% of tissue 86Rb. When T. ruralis is subjected to rapid drying there is no change in the enzyme activities or in lipid peroxidation. However, when this moss is rehydrated there is a large immediate increase in lipid peroxidation. Half of the tissue 86Rb is leaked into the bathing medium during the first hour of rehydration. But within the next hour, when SOD and catalase activities have increased to high levels, lipid peroxidation quickly declines to a level lower than that in the turgid control moss, and the 86Rb leaked earlier is partly reabsorbed indicating that membrane repair is well underway. On prolonged rehydration the enzyme activities decline and the level of lipid peroxidation rises gradually to reach normal levels found in control turgid moss. In the case of drought-sensitive C. filicinum the activities of SOD and catalase decline during drying as well as during subsequent rehydration. There is a rapid increase in lipid peroxidation during rehydration and most of the preloaded 86Rb leaks into the bathing medium irreversibly. The changes in lipid peroxidation during drying and subsequent rehydration of both the mosses appear to coincide in time with the reported changes in O2 uptake, indicating that the drought-induced membrane damage may be due to free radical-induced lipid peroxidation which is known to require active O2 uptake. Furthermore, there appears to be a good correlation between an ability of the tissue to control lipid peroxidation and its ability to retain solutes. It is suggested that ability of plant tissues to mobilize enzymatic defence against uncontrolled lipid peroxidation may be an important facet of their drought tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/32.1.79

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
DHINDSA, R. S., & MATOWE, W.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
1981
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
79-91
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2020610125
Cited by
668
References
1
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drought Tolerance in Two Mosses: Correlated with Enzymatic Defence Against Lipid Peroxidation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/32.1.79
The paper
DHINDSA, R. S., & MATOWE, W. (1981). Drought Tolerance in Two Mosses: Correlated with Enzymatic Defence Against Lipid Peroxidation. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.79

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.