The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infection of sugar cane by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus
Abstract
Significant nitrogen fixation has recently been demonstrated in Brazilian sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum) cultivars known to form associations with a number of diazotrophs, including Acetobacter diazotrophicus, an acid-tolerant endophytic bacterium which grows best on a sucrose-rich medium. In a series of experiments, aseptically-grown sugar cane plantlets were rooted in a liquid medium and inoculated with A. diazotrophicus originally isolated from field-grown sugar cane. After 4, 7, 9, and 15 d, plants were examined under light, scanning and transmission electron microscopes and the presence of A. diazotrophicus on and within plant tissues was confirmed by immunogold labelling. By 15 d, external bacterial colonization was seen on roots and lower stems, particularly at cavities in lateral root junctions. The loose cells of the root cap at root tips were a site of entry of the bacteria into root tissues. Both at lateral root junctions and root tips, bacteria were also seen in enlarged, apparently intact, epidermal cells. After 15 d, bacteria were present in xylem vessels at the base of the stem, many connected via mucus to spiral secondary thickening. There was no obvious pathogenic reaction to the bacteria within the xylem. From these observations, it is proposed that, under experimental conditions, A. diazotrophicus firstly colonized the root and lower stem epidermal surfaces and then used root tips and lateral root junctions to enter the sugar cane plant where it was distributed around the plant in the transpiration stream. It is further suggested that the xylem vessels in the dense shoots of mature plants are also a possible site of N2-fixation by diazotrophs as they provide the low pO2 and energy as sucrose necessary for nitrogenase activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Steenhoudt, O., & Vanderleyden, J. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00036-x · Cited by 992
Elbeltagy, A., Nishioka, K., Sato, T., Suzuki, H., Ye, B., Hamada, T., Isawa, T., Mitsui, H., & Minamisawa, K. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.11.5285-5293.2001 · Cited by 470
Bashan, Y., & Holguin, G. (1998) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00187-9 · Cited by 438
Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants
Baldani, J., Caruso, L., Baldani, V. L. D., Goi, S. R., & Döbereiner, J. (1997) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(96)00218-0 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- James, E. K., Reis, V. M., Olivares, F. L., Baldani, J. I., & Döbereiner, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 757-766
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2148591950
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infection of sugar cane by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/45.6.757
- The paper
- James, E. K., Reis, V. M., Olivares, F. L., Baldani, J. I., & Döbereiner, J. (1994). Infection of sugar cane by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.6.757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.