Mutant genes at the r and rb loci affect the structure and physico-chemical properties of pea seed starches
Abstract
Mutant genes at two loci, r and rb, known to encode genes affecting the starch biosynthetic pathway, were studied for their effect on the structure and gelatinization of pea seed starches. Comparisons were made using starches from four lines (RRRbRb, rrRbRb, RRrbrb, and rrrbrb), near-isogenic except for genes at these two loci. All the starches had C-type X-ray diffraction patterns, but different contents of 'A' and 'B' polymorphs. The presence of a mutation at either locus increased the 'B' polymorph content in the starches, although the influence of the r mutation was much greater than that of rb. Differences were discovered in the crystalline stucture of the rrRbRb starch which correlated with a high content of amorphous phase as well as with the changes in amylopectin structure. In addition, changes in the crystalline structure of this sample correlated with a lack of co-operative transition during starch gelatinization in excess water. The RRrbrb starch had a greatly increased enthalpy of gelatinization in excess water compared with the wild-type starch. It is proposed that this effect is connected with specific charge interactions between the molecules in the starch granule. The rrrbrb starch had parameters of crystalline structure and gelatinization which reflected the different influences of the two genes. With regard to gelatinization, this starch had relatively wide co-operative transition and low enthalpy and a very high peak temperature of transition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the native uncooked state, higher digestibility is observed for high amylose starches, which have a low degree of crystallinity.
“Thus, in the native (uncooked) state, higher digestibility is observed for high amylose starches, which have a low degree of crystallinity (Bogracheva et al., 1995; Tahir et al., 2010a).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Bogracheva et al., 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
“Thus, in the native (uncooked) state, higher digestibility is observed for high amylose starches, which have a low degree of crystallinity (Bogracheva et al., 1995; Tahir et al., 2010a).”
Background
- Authors
- Bogracheva, T. Y., Davydova, N. I., Genin, Y. V., & Hedley, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Biochemical Physics NM Emanuel (RU)
- A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds (RU)
- John Innes Centre (GB)
- ORCID
- Hedley, C.L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1905-1913
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2138626507
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
- Keywords
- R locus, starch crystalline structure, starch polymorphism, amylopectin structure, starch gelatinization, gelatinization enthalpy, near-isogenic lines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review