The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to photosynthesis?
Abstract
This critical review of recent literature questions earlier predictions that photosynthetic productivity of higher plants is vulnerable to increased ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation as a result of stratospheric ozone (O3) depletion. Direct UV-B-induced inhibition of photosynthetic competence is observed only at high UV-B irradiances and primarily involves the loss of soluble Calvin cycle enzymes and adaxial stomatal closure in amphistomatous plants. However, even under these extreme UV-B exposures, acclimation (e.g. induction of UV-B absorbing flavonoids) can protect the photosynthetic processes. In plants irradiated with UV-B throughout development a reduction in productivity is usually associated with a reduced ability to intercept light (i.e. smaller leaf area) and not an inhibition of photosynthetic competence. Finally, a review of field experiments utilizing realistic UV-B enhancement is made to evaluate whether the mechanisms involved in UV-B-induced depressions of photosynthesis are likely to impact on the photosynthetic productivity of crops and natural vegetation in the future. Predictions of plant responses to O3 depletion are suspect from squarewave irradiance experiments in the field and controlled environments due to the increased sensitivity of plants to UV-B at relatively low photosynthetically-active photon flux densities (PPFD) and ultraviolet-A (UV-A) irradiances. Realistic modulated UV-B irradiances in the field do not appear to have any significant effects on photosynthetic competence or light-interception. It is concluded that O3 depletion and the concurrent rise in UV-B irradiance is not a direct threat to photosynthetic productivity of crops and natural vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial and Aquatic Primary Producers
Day, T. A., & Neale, P. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150434 · Cited by 211
Variation in Rubisco content and activity under variable climatic factors.
Galmés, J., Aranjuelo, I., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9861-y · Cited by 194
Responses of plants in polar regions to UVB exposure: a meta‐analysis
NEWSHAM, K. K., & ROBINSON, S. A. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01944.x · Cited by 175
Extreme Ozone Loss Following Nuclear War Results in Enhanced Surface Ultraviolet Radiation
Bardeen, C. G., Kinnison, D. E., Toon, O. B., Mills, M. J., Vitt, F., Xia, L., Jägermeyr, J., Lovenduski, N. S., Scherrer, K. J. N., Clyne, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035079 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, D. J., Nogues, S., & Baker, N. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-11-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 328
- Pages
- 1775-1788
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2133376395
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to photosynthesis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/49.328.1775
- The paper
- Allen, D. J., Nogues, S., & Baker, N. R. (1998). Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to photosynthesis? Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/49.328.1775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.