The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought
Abstract
Symbiotic nitrogen fixation is highly sensitive to drought, which results in decreased N accumulation and yield of legume crops. The effects of drought stress on N2 fixation usually have been perceived as a consequence of straightforward physiological responses acting on nitrogenase activity and involving exclusively one of three mechanisms: carbon shortage, oxygen limitation, or feedback regulation by nitrogen accumulation. The sensitivity of the nodule water economy to the volumetric flow rate of the phloem into the nodule offers a common framework to understand each of these mechanisms. As these processes are sensitive to volumetric phloem flow into the nodules, variations in phloem flow as a result of changes in turgor pressure in the leaves are likely to cause rapid changes in nodule activity. This could explain the special sensitivity of N2 fixation to drying soils. It seems likely that N feedback may be especially important in explaining the response mechanism in nodules. A number of studies have indicated that a nitrogenous signal(s), associated with N accumulation in the shoot and nodule, exists in legume plants so that N2 fixation is inhibited early in soil drying. The existence of genetic variation in N2 fixation response to water deficits among legume cultivars opens the possibility for enhancing N2 fixation tolerance to drought through selection and breeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Figueiredo, M. V. B., Burity, H. A., Martínez, C. R., & Chanway, C. P. (2008) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.04.005 · Cited by 416
Crop transformation and the challenge to increase yield potential
Sinclair, T. R., Purcell, L. C., & Sneller, C. H. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.008 · Cited by 358
Self-citationLiu, F., Jensen, C. R., & Andersen, M. N. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/s0378-4290(03)00165-5 · Cited by 290
Martínez-Mena, M., Garcia-Franco, N., Almagro, M., Ruiz-Navarro, A., Albaladejo, J., de Aguilar, J. M., Gonzalez, D., & Querejeta, J. I. (2013) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.006 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Serraj, R., Sinclair, T. R., & Purcell, L. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 331
- Pages
- 143-155
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2144218698
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/50.331.143
- The paper
- Serraj, R., Sinclair, T. R., & Purcell, L. C. (1999). Symbiotic N2 fixation response to drought. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/50.331.143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.