The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal‐induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this review is to assess the mode of action and role of antioxidants as protection from heavy metal stress in roots, mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhizae. Based on their chemical and physical properties three different molecular mechanisms of heavy metal toxicity can be distinguished: (a) production of reactive oxygen species by autoxidation and Fenton reaction; this reaction is typical for transition metals such as iron or copper, (b) blocking of essential functional groups in biomolecules, this reaction has mainly been reported for non‐redox‐reactive heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury, (c) displacement of essential metal ions from biomolecules; the latter reaction occurs with different kinds of heavy metals. Transition metals cause oxidative injury in plant tissue, but a literature survey did not provide evidence that this stress could be alleviated by increased levels of antioxidative systems. The reason may be that transition metals initiate hydroxyl radical production, which can not be controlled by antioxidants. Exposure of plants to non‐redox reactive metals also resulted in oxidative stress as indicated by lipid peroxidation, H 2 O 2 accumulation, and an oxidative burst. Cadmium and some other metals caused a transient depletion of GSH and an inhibition of antioxidative enzymes, especially of glutathione reductase. Assessment of antioxidative capacities by metabolic modelling suggested that the reported diminution of antioxidants was sufficient to cause H 2 O 2 accumulation. The depletion of GSH is apparently a critical step in cadmium sensitivity since plants with improved capacities for GSH synthesis displayed higher Cd tolerance. Available data suggest that cadmium, when not detoxified rapidly enough, may trigger, via the disturbance of the redox control of the cell, a sequence of reactions leading to growth inhibition, stimulation of secondary metabolism, lignification, and finally cell death. This view is in contrast to the idea that cadmium results in unspecific necrosis. Plants in certain mycorrhizal associations are less sensitive to cadmium stress than non‐mycorrhizal plants. Data about antioxidative systems in mycorrhizal fungi in pure culture and in symbiosis are scarce. The present results indicate that mycorrhization stimulated the phenolic defence system in the Paxillus–Pinus mycorrhizal symbiosis. Cadmium‐induced changes in mycorrhizal roots were absent or smaller than those in non‐mycorrhizal roots. These observations suggest that although changes in rhizospheric conditions were perceived by the root part of the symbiosis, the typical Cd‐induced stress responses of phenolics were buffered. It is not known whether mycorrhization protected roots from Cd‐induced injury by preventing access of cadmium to sensitive extra‐ or intracellular sites, or by excreted or intrinsic metal‐chelators, or by other defence systems. It is possible that mycorrhizal fungi provide protection via GSH since higher concentrations of this thiol were found in pure cultures of the fungi than in bare roots. The development of stress‐tolerant plant‐mycorrhizal associations may be a promising new strategy for phytoremediation and soil amelioration measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction in vivo and in vitro
Imlay, J. A., Chin, S. M., & Linn, S. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2834821 · Cited by 1,555
Cited by
Metals, minerals and microbes: geomicrobiology and bioremediation
Gadd, G. M. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.037143-0 · Cited by 2,013
Zhang, P., Li, J., Lv, L., Zhao, Y., & Qu, L. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b01965 · Cited by 1,081
Elemike, E. E., Uzoh, I. M., Onwudiwe, D. C., & Babalola, O. O. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9030499 · Cited by 499
Jonak, C., Nakagami, H., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.045724 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Schützendübel, A., & Polle, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-15
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 372
- Pages
- 1351-1365
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W4247459847
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal‐induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/53.372.1351
- The paper
- Schützendübel, A., & Polle, A. (2002). Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal‐induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/53.372.1351
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.