The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shaping the leaf microbiota: plant–microbe–microbe interactions
Open accessAbstract
The aerial portion of a plant, namely the leaf, is inhabited by pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes. The leaf’s physical and chemical properties, combined with fluctuating and often challenging environmental factors, create surfaces that require a high degree of adaptation for microbial colonization. As a consequence, specific interactive processes have evolved to establish a plant leaf niche. Little is known about the impact of the host immune system on phyllosphere colonization by non-pathogenic microbes. These organisms can trigger plant basal defenses and benefit the host by priming for enhanced resistance to pathogens. In most disease resistance responses, microbial signals are recognized by extra- or intracellular receptors. The interactions tend to be species specific and it is unclear how they shape leaf microbial communities. In natural habitats, microbe–microbe interactions are also important for shaping leaf communities. To protect resources, plant colonizers have developed direct antagonistic or host manipulation strategies to fight competitors. Phyllosphere-colonizing microbes respond to abiotic and biotic fluctuations and are therefore an important resource for adaptive and protective traits. Understanding the complex regulatory host–microbe–microbe networks is needed to transfer current knowledge to biotechnological applications such as plant-protective probiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M., & Sessitsch, A. (2015) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00050-14 · Cited by 2,708
Microbial life in the phyllosphere
Vorholt, J. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2910 · Cited by 2,303
Microbiology of the Phyllosphere
Lindow, S. E., & Brandl, M. T. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.4.1875-1883.2003 · Cited by 2,264
The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont
Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Quaiser, A., Duhamel, M., Le Van, A., & Dufresne, A. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13312 · Cited by 2,215
Plant Stomata Function in Innate Immunity against Bacterial Invasion
Melotto, M., Underwood, W., Koczan, J., Nomura, K., & He, S. Y. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054 · Cited by 1,981
Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks
Thébault, E., & Fontaine, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188321 · Cited by 1,805
Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms
Flemming, H.-C., & Wuertz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9 · Cited by 1,729
Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Network Architectures
Ng, W.-L., & Bassler, B. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134304 · Cited by 1,679
Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont
Hassani, M. A., Durán, P., & Hacquard, S. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0445-0 · Cited by 1,404
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaudhry, V., Runge, P., Sengupta, P., Doehlemann, G., Parker, J. E., & Kemen, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-09-10
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-56
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W3086845813
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 189
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shaping the leaf microbiota: plant–microbe–microbe interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/eraa417
- The paper
- Chaudhry, V., Runge, P., Sengupta, P., Doehlemann, G., Parker, J. E., & Kemen, E. (2021). Shaping the leaf microbiota: plant–microbe–microbe interactions. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.