Cited by 23Wheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyPlant Molecular Biology ResearchGenetics and Plant Breeding

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel exotic alleles of EARLY FLOWERING 3 determine plant development in barley

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

EARLY FLOWERING 3 (ELF3) is an important regulator of various physiological and developmental processes and hence may serve to improve plant adaptation which will be essential for future plant breeding. To expand the limited knowledge on barley ELF3 in determining agronomic traits, we conducted field studies with heterogeneous inbred families (HIFs) derived from selected lines of the wild barley nested association mapping population HEB-25. During two growing seasons, phenotypes of nearly isogenic HIF sister lines, segregating for exotic and cultivated alleles at the ELF3 locus, were compared for 10 developmental and yield-related traits. We determine novel exotic ELF3 alleles and show that HIF lines, carrying the exotic ELF3 allele, accelerated plant development compared with the cultivated ELF3 allele, depending on the genetic background. Remarkably, the most extreme effects on phenology could be attributed to one exotic ELF3 allele differing from the cultivated Barke ELF3 allele in only one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). This SNP causes an amino acid substitution (W669G), which as predicted has an impact on the protein structure of ELF3. Consequently, it may affect phase separation behaviour and nano-compartment formation of ELF3 and, potentially, also its local cellular interactions causing significant trait differences between HIF sister lines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/erad127

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Alqudah, 2017, Heading date is not flowering time in spring barley, Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 896, 10.3389/fpls.2017.00896 · DOI
  2. Andres, 2012, The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues, Nature Reviews. Genetics, 13, 627, 10.1038/nrg3291 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Anwer, 2020, Photoperiod sensing of the circadian clock is controlled by EARLY FLOWERING 3 and GIGANTEA, The Plant Journal, 101, 1397, 10.1111/tpj.14604 · DOI
  4. Bayer, 2017, Development and evaluation of a Barley 50k iSelect SNP array, Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1792, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01792 · DOI
  5. Bendix, 2015, Circadian clock genes universally control key agricultural traits, Molecular Plant, 8, 1135, 10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.003 · DOI
  6. Bergelson, 2010, Towards identifying genes underlying ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana, Nature Reviews. Genetics, 11, 867, 10.1038/nrg2896 · DOI
  7. Blum, 2021, The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D344, 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Blümel, 2015, Flowering time regulation in crops—what did we learn from Arabidopsis?, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 32, 121, 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.023 · DOI
  9. Boden, 2014, EARLY FLOWERING3 regulates flowering in spring barley by mediating gibberellin production and FLOWERING LOCUS T expression, The Plant Cell, 26, 1557, 10.1105/tpc.114.123794 · DOI
  10. Bouché, 2021, EARLY FLOWERING 3 and photoperiod sensing in Brachypodium distachyon, Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 769194, 10.3389/fpls.2021.769194 · DOI
  11. Box, 2015, ELF3 controls thermoresponsive growth in Arabidopsis, Current Biology, 25, 194, 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.076 · DOI
  12. Calixto, 2015, Evolutionary relationships among barley and Arabidopsis core circadian clock and clock-associated genes, Journal of Molecular Evolution, 80, 108, 10.1007/s00239-015-9665-0 · DOI
  13. Cammarano, 2021, Genetic and management effects on barley yield and phenology in the Mediterranean Basin, Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 655406, 10.3389/fpls.2021.655406 · DOI
  14. Campoli, 2012, Functional characterisation of HvCO1, the barley (Hordeum vulgare) flowering time ortholog of CONSTANS, The Plant Journal, 69, 868, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04839.x · DOI
  15. Campoli, 2012, Expression conservation within the circadian clock of a monocot: natural variation at barley Ppd-H1 affects circadian expression of flowering time genes, but not clock orthologs, BMC Plant Biology, 12, 97, 10.1186/1471-2229-12-97 · DOI
  16. Campoli, 2014, Genetic control of reproductive development in temperate cereals, Advances in Botanical Research, 72, 131, 10.1016/B978-0-12-417162-6.00005-5 · DOI
  17. Casas, 2021, Candidate genes underlying QTL for flowering time and their interactions in a wide spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross, The Crop Journal, 9, 862, 10.1016/j.cj.2020.07.008 · DOI
  18. Cockram, 2007, Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity, Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 1231, 10.1093/jxb/erm042 · DOI
  19. Crooks, 2004, WebLogo: a sequence logo generator, Genome Research, 14, 1188, 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
  20. Deng, 2015, Direct links between the vernalization response and other key traits of cereal crops, Nature Communications, 6, 5882, 10.1038/ncomms6882 · DOI
  21. Digel, 2015, Global transcriptome profiling of developing leaf and shoot apices reveals distinct genetic and environmental control of floral transition and inflorescence development in barley, The Plant Cell, 27, 2318, 10.1105/tpc.15.00203 · DOI
  22. Dixon, 2011, Temporal repression of core circadian genes is mediated through EARLY FLOWERING 3 in Arabidopsis, Current Biology, 21, 120, 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.013 · DOI
  23. Ejaz, 2017, The genetic control of reproductive development under high ambient temperature, Plant Physiology, 173, 294, 10.1104/pp.16.01275 · DOI
  24. Ellis, 2000, Wild barley: a source of genes for crop improvement in the 21st century?, Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 9, 10.1093/jexbot/51.342.9 · DOI
  25. Ezer, 2017, The evening complex coordinates environmental and endogenous signals in Arabidopsis, Nature Plants, 3, 17087, 10.1038/nplants.2017.87 · DOI
  26. Faure, 2012, Mutation at the circadian clock gene EARLY MATURITY 8 adapts domesticated barley (Hordeum vulgare) to short growing seasons, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 8328, 10.1073/pnas.1120496109 · DOI
  27. Fernandez-Calleja, 2021, Major flowering time genes of barley: allelic diversity, effects, and comparison with wheat, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134, 1867, 10.1007/s00122-021-03824-z · DOI
  28. Francia, 2011, Determinants of barley grain yield in a wide range of Mediterranean environments, Field Crops Research, 120, 169, 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.010 · DOI
  29. Franklin, 2011, Phytochrome-interacting factor 4 (PIF4) regulates auxin biosynthesis at high temperature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 20231, 10.1073/pnas.1110682108 · DOI
  30. Gabler, 2020, Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics toolkit, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 72, e108, 10.1002/cpbi.108 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Gangappa, 2017, PIF4 coordinates thermosensory growth and immunity in Arabidopsis, Current Biology, 27, 243, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.012 · DOI
  32. Gasteiger, 2003, ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis, Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 3784, 10.1093/nar/gkg563 · DOI
  33. Gol, 2021, Ppd-H1 integrates drought stress signals to control spike development and flowering time in barley, Journal of Experimental Botany, 72, 122, 10.1093/jxb/eraa261 · DOI
  34. Habte, 2014, Osmotic stress at the barley root affects expression of circadian clock genes in the shoot, Plant, Cell & Environment, 37, 1321, 10.1111/pce.12242 · DOI
  35. Harmer, 2009, The circadian system in higher plants, Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60, 357, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092054 · DOI
  36. Hedden, 2003, The genes of the Green Revolution, Trends in Genetics, 19, 5, 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00009-4 · DOI
  37. Hemming, 2008, Low-temperature and daylength cues are integrated to regulate FLOWERING LOCUS T in barley, Plant Physiology, 147, 355, 10.1104/pp.108.116418 · DOI
  38. Herrero, 2012, EARLY FLOWERING4 recruitment of EARLY FLOWERING3 in the nucleus sustains the Arabidopsis circadian clock, The Plant Cell, 24, 428, 10.1105/tpc.111.093807 · DOI
  39. Herzig, 2019, Genetic dissection of grain elements predicted by hyperspectral imaging associated with yield-related traits in a wild barley NAM population, Plant Science, 285, 151, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.05.008 · DOI
  40. Herzig, 2018, Contrasting genetic regulation of plant development in wild barley grown in two European environments revealed by nested association mapping, Journal of Experimental Botany, 69, 1517, 10.1093/jxb/ery002 · DOI
  41. Hicks, 2001, EARLY FLOWERING3 encodes a novel protein that regulates circadian clock function and flowering in Arabidopsis, The Plant Cell, 13, 1281, 10.1105/TPC.010070 · DOI
  42. Huang, 2016, Identification of evening complex associated proteins in Arabidopsis by affinity purification and mass spectrometry, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 15, 201, 10.1074/mcp.M115.054064 · DOI
  43. Huang, 2017, Cross-species complementation reveals conserved functions for EARLY FLOWERING 3 between monocots and dicots, Plant Direct, 1, e00018, 10.1002/pld3.18 · DOI
  44. Huang, 2016, Into the evening: complex interactions in the Arabidopsis circadian clock, Trends in Genetics, 32, 674, 10.1016/j.tig.2016.08.002 · DOI
  45. Jayakodi, 2020, The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding, Nature, 588, 284, 10.1038/s41586-020-2947-8 · DOI · Paper page
  46. JCBN., 1984, Nomenclature and symbolism for amino acids and peptides. Recommendations 1983, European Journal of Biochemistry, 138, 9, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb07877.x · DOI
  47. Jung, 2020, A prion-like domain in ELF3 functions as a thermosensor in Arabidopsis, Nature, 585, 256, 10.1038/s41586-020-2644-7 · DOI
  48. Katoh, 2019, MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20, 1160, 10.1093/bib/bbx108 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kazan, 2016, The link between flowering time and stress tolerance, Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 47, 10.1093/jxb/erv441 · DOI
  50. Kim, 2018, Transient secondary structures as general target-binding motifs in intrinsically disordered proteins, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 3614, 10.3390/ijms19113614 · DOI
  51. Klukas, 2014, Integrated analysis platform: an open-source information system for high-throughput plant phenotyping, Plant Physiology, 165, 506, 10.1104/pp.113.233932 · DOI
  52. Koini, 2009, High temperature-mediated adaptations in plant architecture require the bHLH transcription factor PIF4, Current Biology, 19, 408, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.046 · DOI
  53. Kumar, 2012, Transcription factor PIF4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering, Nature, 484, 242, 10.1038/nature10928 · DOI
  54. Kuraku, 2013, aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity, Nucleic Acids Research, 41, W22, 10.1093/nar/gkt389 · DOI
  55. Liu, 2001, ELF3 encodes a circadian clock-regulated nuclear protein that functions in an Arabidopsis PHYB signal transduction pathway, The Plant Cell, 13, 1293
  56. Majumdar, 2019, Liquid–liquid phase separation is driven by large-scale conformational unwinding and fluctuations of intrinsically disordered protein molecules, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 10, 3929, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01731 · DOI
  57. Maurer, 2015, Modelling the genetic architecture of flowering time control in barley through nested association mapping, BMC Genomics, 16, 290, 10.1186/s12864-015-1459-7 · DOI
  58. Maurer, 2016, Genomic dissection of plant development and its impact on thousand grain weight in barley through nested association mapping, Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 2507, 10.1093/jxb/erw070 · DOI
  59. Maurer, 2017, Estimating parent-specific QTL effects through cumulating linked identity-by-state SNP effects in multiparental populations, Heredity, 118, 477, 10.1038/hdy.2016.121 · DOI
  60. McMaster, 1997, Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 87, 291, 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0 · DOI
  61. McSwiggen, 2019, Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences, Genes & Development, 33, 1619, 10.1101/gad.331520.119 · DOI
  62. Minor, 1994, Measurement of the beta-sheet-forming propensities of amino acids, Nature, 367, 660, 10.1038/367660a0 · DOI
  63. Monat, 2019, TRITEX: chromosome-scale sequence assembly of Triticeae genomes with open-source tools, Genome Biology, 20, 284, 10.1186/s13059-019-1899-5 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Müller, 2020, Differential effects of day/night cues and the circadian clock on the barley transcriptome, Plant Physiology, 183, 765, 10.1104/pp.19.01411 · DOI
  65. Necci, 2017, MobiDB-lite: fast and highly specific consensus prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins, Bioinformatics, 33, 1402, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx015 · DOI
  66. Nevo, 2013, Evolution of wild barley and barley improvement., 1, 10.1007/978-94-007-4682-4_1 · DOI
  67. Nieto, 2015, ELF3–PIF4 interaction regulates plant growth independently of the Evening Complex, Current Biology, 25, 187, 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.070 · DOI
  68. Nusinow, 2011, The ELF4–ELF3–LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth, Nature, 475, 398, 10.1038/nature10182 · DOI
  69. Pourkheirandish, 2015, Evolution of the grain dispersal system in barley, Cell, 162, 527, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.002 · DOI
  70. Quint, 2016, Molecular and genetic control of plant thermomorphogenesis, Nature Plants, 2, 15190, 10.1038/nplants.2015.190 · DOI
  71. Raschke, 2015, Natural variants of ELF3 affect thermomorphogenesis by transcriptionally modulating PIF4-dependent auxin response genes, BMC Plant Biology, 15, 197, 10.1186/s12870-015-0566-6 · DOI
  72. Saade, 2016, Yield-related salinity tolerance traits identified in a nested association mapping (NAM) population of wild barley, Scientific Reports, 6, 32586, 10.1038/srep32586 · DOI
  73. Semagn, 2014, Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP): overview of the technology and its application in crop improvement, Molecular Breeding, 33, 1, 10.1007/s11032-013-9917-x · DOI
  74. Smith, 1994, A thermodynamic scale for the beta-sheet forming tendencies of the amino acids, Biochemistry, 33, 5510, 10.1021/bi00184a020 · DOI
  75. Szklarczyk, 2021, The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets, Nucleic Acids Research, 49, D605, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Tanksley, 1997, Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild, Science, 277, 1063, 10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · DOI
  77. Thines, 2010, Ambient temperature response establishes ELF3 as a required component of the core Arabidopsis circadian clock, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 3257, 10.1073/pnas.0911006107 · DOI
  78. Tuinstra, 1997, Heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) analysis: a method for developing near-isogenic lines that differ at quantitative trait loci, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 95, 1005, 10.1007/s001220050654 · DOI
  79. Turner, 2005, The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley, Science, 310, 1031, 10.1126/science.1117619 · DOI
  80. Vernon, 2018, Pi–Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation, eLife, 7, e31486, 10.7554/eLife.31486 · DOI
  81. von Zitzewitz, 2005, Molecular and structural characterization of barley vernalization genes, Plant Molecular Biology, 59, 449, 10.1007/s11103-005-0351-2 · DOI
  82. Wiegmann, 2019, Barley yield formation under abiotic stress depends on the interplay between flowering time genes and environmental cues, Scientific Reports, 9, 6397, 10.1038/s41598-019-42673-1 · DOI
  83. Wijnen, 2006, Interplay of circadian clocks and metabolic rhythms, Annual Review of Genetics, 40, 409, 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090603 · DOI
  84. Xia, 2017, The alternative splicing of EAM8 contributes to early flowering and short-season adaptation in a landrace barley from the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 130, 757, 10.1007/s00122-016-2848-2 · DOI
  85. Yan, 2006, The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 19581, 10.1073/pnas.0607142103 · DOI
  86. Yan, 2004, The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor down-regulated by vernalization, Science, 303, 1640, 10.1126/science.1094305 · DOI
  87. Yan, 2003, Positional cloning of the wheat vernalization gene VRN1, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 6263, 10.1073/pnas.0937399100 · DOI
  88. Yu, 2008, COP1 and ELF3 control circadian function and photoperiodic flowering by regulating GI stability, Molecular Cell, 32, 617, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.026 · DOI
  89. Zadoks, 1974, A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, Weed Research, 14, 415, 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x · DOI
  90. Zagotta, 1996, The Arabidopsis ELF3 gene regulates vegetative photomorphogenesis and the photoperiodic induction of flowering, The Plant Journal, 10, 691, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10040691.x · DOI
  91. Zakhrabekova, 2012, Induced mutations in circadian clock regulator Mat-a facilitated short-season adaptation and range extension in cultivated barley, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 4326, 10.1073/pnas.1113009109 · DOI
  92. Zamir, 2001, Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries, Nature Reviews. Genetics, 2, 983, 10.1038/35103590 · DOI
  93. Zheng, 2013, Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments, Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 3747, 10.1093/jxb/ert209 · DOI
  94. Zhu, 2022, Arabidopsis Early Flowering 3 controls temperature responsiveness of the circadian clock independently of the evening complex, Journal of Experimental Botany, 73, 1049, 10.1093/jxb/erab473 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zahn, T., Zhu, Z., Ritoff, N., Krapf, J., Junker, A., Altmann, T., Schmutzer, T., Tüting, C., Kastritis, P. L., Babben, S., Quint, M., Pillen, K., & Maurer, A.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) (DE)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Maurer, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2023-04-03
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
3630-3650
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W4362506139
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Social Fund
  • Federal Ministry for Education and Research (03Z22HN23, 03Z22HI2, and 03COV04)
  • European Regional Development Fund (ZS/2016/04/78115)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (391498659)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
EARLY FLOWERING 3, ELF3, barley, wild barley, nested association mapping, plant development, phenology, yield components, single nucleotide polymorphisms, amino acid substitutions, protein phase separation, genetic background effects
MeSH terms
Plant Breeding, Alleles, Hordeum, Chromosome Mapping, Quantitative Trait Loci, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review