The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significance of skin flavonoids for UV-B-protection in apple fruits
Open accessAbstract
An attempt has been made to assess the UV-B-protective capacity of phenolic compounds accumulated in superficial structures of plants using apple fruit as a model. Two apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivars (Braeburn and Granny Smith) differing in response to high fluxes of solar radiation were selected and exposed to increasing doses of UV-B radiation. The extent of UV-B-induced damage to photosystem II of apple skin correlated with its quercetin glycoside (but not anthocyanin) content. Granny Smith apples did not demonstrate a pronounced response to high sunlight in terms of the accumulation of phenolic substances in the skin and exhibited similar patterns of Fo, Fm, and Fv/Fm changes in the course of UV-B irradiation both on sun-exposed and shaded surfaces of a fruit. Unlike Granny Smith, Braeburn fruits were characterized by a significant accumulation of quercetin glycosides in sun-exposed skin, however, shaded skin contained these compounds in similar amounts to those in Granny Smith. Accordingly, photosystem II in sun-exposed skin of Braeburn apples was resistant to high doses of UV-B radiation (up to 97 kJ m-2), whereas the susceptibility of the photosynthetic apparatus in shaded skin of Braeburn to UV-B-induced damage was much higher and similar to that of both sun-exposed and shaded skin of Granny Smith fruits. Anthocyanins, at least in the amounts found in Braeburn, did not show an additional effect in UV-B protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 · Cited by 11,663
Light quality affects flavonoid biosynthesis in young berries of Cabernet Sauvignon grape
Koyama, K., Ikeda, H., Poudel, P. R., & Goto-Yamamoto, N. (2012) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.026 · Cited by 279
Kimura, S., & Sakaguchi, K. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040482n · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Solovchenko, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 389
- Pages
- 1977-1984
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2159087783
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of skin flavonoids for UV-B-protection in apple fruits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erg199
- The paper
- Solovchenko, A. (2003). Significance of skin flavonoids for UV-B-protection in apple fruits. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.