The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flower opening and closure: a review
Open accessAbstract
Flower opening and closure are traits of a reproductive syndrome, as it allows pollen removal and/or pollination. Various types of opening can be distinguished such as nocturnal and diurnal and single or repetitive. Opening is generally due to cell expansion. Osmotic solute levels increase by the conversion of polysaccharides (starch or fructan) to monosaccharides, and/or the uptake of sugars from the apoplast. Repeated opening and closure movements are often brought about by differential elongation. In tulip petals, for example, the upper and lower sides of the mesophyll exhibit a 10 degrees C difference in optimum temperature for elongation growth, resulting in opening in the morning and closure in the evening. Opening and closure in several other species is regulated by changes in light intensity and, in some species with nocturnal opening, by an increase in relative humidity. A minimum duration of darkness and light are usually required for opening and closure, respectively, in flowers that open during the day. Both phytochrome and a blue light receptor seem involved in light perception. In some species, opening and closure are regulated by an endogenous rhythm, which, in all cases investigated, can be reset by changes from dark to light and/or light to dark. So far, Arabidopsis mutants have not been used to investigate the timing of flower opening and closure. As its flowers open and close in a circadian fashion, several mutants that are involved in the circadian clock and its light input may help to provide an insight into this type of flower opening. The co-ordination of processes culminating in synchronized flower opening is, in many species, highly intricate. The complex control by endogenous and exogenous factors sets flower opening and closure apart from most other growth processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4544 · Cited by 3,027
Ruelland, E., & Zachowski, A. (2010) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.05.011 · Cited by 507
Sequential self-folding of polymer sheets
Liu, Y., Shaw, B., Dickey, M. D., & Genzer, J. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602417 · Cited by 335
Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications
Marbach, S., & Bocquet, L. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00420j · Cited by 316
Sculpting tissues by phase transitions
Lenne, P.-F., & Trivedi, V. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28151-9 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- van Doorn, W. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 389
- Pages
- 1801-1812
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2137197087
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flower opening and closure: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erg213
- The paper
- van Doorn, W. G. (2003). Flower opening and closure: a review. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.