The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize
Open accessAbstract
To study the genetic variability and the genetic basis of nitrogen (N) use efficiency in maize, a set of recombinant inbred lines crossed with a tester was studied at low input (N-) and high input (N+) for grain yield and its components, grain protein content, and post-anthesis nitrogen uptake and remobilization. Other physiological traits, such as nitrate content, nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase (GS), and glutamate dehydrogenase activities were studied at the level of the lines. Genotypexnitrogen (GxN) interaction was significant for yield and explained by variation in kernel number. In N-, N-uptake, the nitrogen nutrition index, and GS activity in the vegetative stage were positively correlated with grain yield, whereas leaf senescence was negatively correlated. Whatever N-input, post-anthesis N-uptake was highly negatively related to N-remobilization. As a whole, genetic variability was expressed differently in N+ and N-. This was confirmed by the detection of QTLs. More QTLs were detected in N+ than in N- for traits of vegetative development, N-uptake, and grain yield and its components, whereas it was the reverse for grain protein content and N-utilization efficiency. Several coincidences between genes encoding for enzymes of N metabolism and QTLs for the traits studied were observed. In particular, coincidences in three chromosome regions of QTLs for yield and N-remobilization, QTLs for GS activity and a gene encoding cytosolic GS were observed. This may have a physiological meaning. The GS locus on chromosome 5 appears to be a good candidate gene which can, at least partially, explain the variation in nitrogen use efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311
Cited by
Plant Nitrogen Assimilation and Use Efficiency
Xu, G., Fan, X., & Miller, A. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105532 · Cited by 2,114
Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement
Hufford, M. B., Xu, X., van Heerwaarden, J., Pyhäjärvi, T., Chia, J.-M., Cartwright, R. A., Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Guill, K. E., Kaeppler, S. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2309 · Cited by 960
Good, A. G., Shrawat, A. K., & Muench, D. G. (2004) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.10.008 · Cited by 931
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallais, A., & Hirel, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01-22
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 396
- Pages
- 295-306
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2162517016
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erh006
- The paper
- Gallais, A., & Hirel, B. (2004). An approach to the genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.