Cited by 1,311Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen

Open access
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., Stern, M.D.·2005·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Protein metabolism in the rumen is the result of metabolic activity of ruminal microorganisms. The structure of the protein is a key factor in determining its susceptibility to microbial proteases and, thus, its degradability. Ruminal protein degradation is affected by pH and the predominant species of microbial population. Ruminal proteolytic activity decreases as pH decreases with high-forage dairy cattle-type rations, but not in high-concentrate beef-type rations. Accumulation of amino acid (AA) N after feeding suggests that AA uptake by rumen microorganisms could be the limiting factor of protein degradation in the rumen. In addition, there are several AA, such as Phe, Leu, and Ile, that are synthesized by rumen microorganisms with greater difficulty than other AA. The most common assessment of efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (EMPS) is determination of grams of microbial N per unit of rumen available energy, typically expressed as true organic matter or carbohydrates fermented. However, EMPS is unable to estimate the efficiency at which bacteria capture available N in the rumen. An alternative and complementary measure of microbial protein synthesis is the efficiency of N use (ENU). In contrast to EMPS, ENU is a good measurement for describing efficiency of N capture by ruminal microbes. Using EMPS and ENU, it was concluded that optimum bacterial growth in the rumen occurs when EMPS is 29 g of bacterial N/kg of fermented organic matter, and ENU is 69%, implying that bacteria would require about 1.31 x rumen-available N per unit of bacterial N. Because the distribution of N within bacterial cells changes with rate of fermentation, AA N, rather than total bacterial N should be used to express microbial protein synthesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Stern, M.D.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2005-04
Volume
88
Pages
E9-E21
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001088676
Cited by
1,311
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 65
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
rumen nitrogen metabolism, rumen protein degradation, rumen pH, amino nitrogen, microbial protein synthesis, rumen fermentation, dairy cattle feed
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Ammonia, Animals, Bacteria, Energy Metabolism, Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Nitrogen, Peptide Hydrolases, Proteins, Rumen, Protein Biosynthesis, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review