The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breeding for high water-use efficiency
Open accessAbstract
There is a pressing need to improve the water-use efficiency of rain-fed and irrigated crop production. Breeding crop varieties with higher water-use efficiency is seen as providing part of the solution. Three key processes can be exploited in breeding for high water-use efficiency: (i) moving more of the available water through the crop rather than it being wasted as evaporation from the soil surface or drainage beyond the root zone or being left behind in the root zone at harvest; (ii) acquiring more carbon (biomass) in exchange for the water transpired by the crop, i.e. improving crop transpiration efficiency; (iii) partitioning more of the achieved biomass into the harvested product. The relative importance of any one of these processes will vary depending on how water availability varies during the crop cycle. However, these three processes are not independent. Targeting specific traits to improve one process may have detrimental effects on the other two, but there may also be positive interactions. Progress in breeding for improved water-use efficiency of rain-fed wheat is reviewed to illustrate the nature of some of these interactions and to highlight opportunities that may be exploited in other crops as well as potential pitfalls. For C3 species, measuring carbon isotope discrimination provides a powerful means of improving water-use efficiency of leaf gas exchange, but experience has shown that improvements in leaf-level water-use efficiency may not always translate into higher crop water-use efficiency or yield. In fact, the reverse has frequently been observed. Reasons for this are explored in some detail. Crop simulation modelling can be used to assess the likely impact on water-use efficiency and yield of changing the expression of traits of interest. Results of such simulations indicate that greater progress may be achieved by pyramiding traits so that potential negative effects of individual traits are neutralized. DNA-based selection techniques may assist in such a strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Farquhar, G., O'Leary, M., & Berry, J. (1982) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp9820121 · Cited by 3,903
Isotopic Composition of Plant Carbon Correlates With Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes
Farquhar, G., & Richards, R. (1984) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp9840539 · Cited by 2,200
Long, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erg262 · Cited by 1,252
Fischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887 · cited 4×
“There are techniques available for detecting genotypic variation in conductance directly and rapidly using viscous-flow porometers (Rebetzke et al., 2001) or indirectly using oxygen isotope composition of dry matter (Farquhar et al., 1997) or canopy temperature (Fischer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEfficient Water Use in Crop Production: Research or Re‐Search?
Tanner, C. B., & Sinclair, T. R. (1983) · ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Books · doi:10.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c1 · Cited by 833
Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations.
Ehleringer, J. R., Hall, A. E., & Farquhar, G. D. (1993) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 768
Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., & van Herwaarden, A. F. (2002) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0111 · Cited by 727
Self-citationImproving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield
Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., & Farquhar, G. D. (2002) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0122 · Cited by 685
Self-citationGrain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat.
Passioura, J. B. (1977) · Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science · Cited by 586
Cited by
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100 · Cited by 1,880
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878
Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Condon, A. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-09-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 407
- Pages
- 2447-2460
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2146542553
- Cited by
- 1,208
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breeding for high water-use efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erh277
- The paper
- Condon, A. G. (2004). Breeding for high water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.