The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield
Abstract
Greater yield per unit rainfall is one of the most important challenges in dryland agriculture. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency (W(T)), the ratio of CO(2) assimilation rate to transpiration rate at the stomata, may be one means of achieving this goal. Carbon isotope discrimination (Delta(13)C) is recognized as a reliable surrogate for W(T) and there have now been numerous studies which have examined the relationship between crop yield and W(T) (measured as Delta(13)C). These studies have shown the relationship between yield and W(T) to be highly variable. The impact on crop yield of genotypic variation in W(T) will depend on three factors: (i) the impact of variation in W(T) on crop growth rate, (ii) the impact of variation in W(T) on the rate of crop water use, and (iii) how growth and water use interact over the crop's duration to produce grain yield. The relative importance of these three factors will differ depending on the crop species being grown and the nature of the cropping environment. Here we consider these interactions using (i) the results of field trials with bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat (T. turgidum L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) that have examined the association between yield and Delta(13)C and (ii) computer simulations with the SIMTAG wheat crop growth model. We present details of progress in breeding to improve W(T) and yield of wheat for Australian environments where crop growth is strongly dependent on subsoil moisture stored from out-of-season rains and assess other opportunities to improve crop yield using W(T).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Self-citationFischer, R. A., Rees, D., Sayre, K. D., Lu, Z. ‐., Condon, A. G., & Saavedra, A. L. (1998) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183x003800060011x · Cited by 887
Self-citation
Cited by
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
Breeding for high water-use efficiency
Condon, A. G. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh277 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationImpact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world
Bertolino, L. T., Caine, R. S., & Gray, J. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 · Cited by 706
Chenu, K., Cooper, M., Hammer, G. L., Mathews, K. L., Dreccer, M. F., & Chapman, S. C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq459 · Cited by 298
Crops, Nitrogen, Water: Are Legumes Friend, Foe, or Misunderstood Ally?
Adams, M. A., Buchmann, N., Sprent, J., Buckley, T. N., & Turnbull, T. L. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2018.02.009 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., & Farquhar, G. D.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 122
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1976215996
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2002.0122
- The paper
- Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., & Farquhar, G. D. (2002). Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.