The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging the production of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescent sensor, Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green(R)
Open accessAbstract
Singlet oxygen is known to be produced by cells in response to photo-oxidative stresses and wounding. Due to singlet oxygen being highly reactive, it is thought to have a very short half-life in biological systems and, consequently, it is difficult to detect. A new commercially available reagent (singlet oxygen sensor green, SOSG), which is highly selective for singlet oxygen, was applied to a range of biological systems that are known to generate singlet oxygen. Induction of singlet oxygen production by the addition of myoglobin to liposome preparations demonstrated that the singlet oxygen-induced increases in SOSG fluorescence closely followed the increase in the concentration of conjugated dienes, which is stoichiometrically related to singlet oxygen production. Applications of photo-oxidative stresses to diatom species and leaves, which are known to result in the production of singlet oxygen, produced large increases in SOSG fluorescence, as did the addition of 3-(3',4'-dichlorophenyl)1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) to these systems, which inhibits electron transport in photosystem II and stimulates singlet oxygen production. The conditional fluorescent (flu) mutant of Arabidopsis produces singlet oxygen when exposed to light after a dark period, and this coincided with a large increase in SOSG fluorescence. Wounding of leaves was followed by an increase in SOSG fluorescence, even in the dark. It is concluded that SOSG is a useful in vivo probe for the detection of singlet oxygen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction
Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 · Cited by 11,723
Cited by
Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M. H. M., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S., Mahmud, J., Fujita, M., & Fotopoulos, V. (2020) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox9080681 · Cited by 3,096
Fluorescent and luminescent probes for detection of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species
Chen, X., Tian, X., Shin, I., & Yoon, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15037e · Cited by 980
Photosensitizers with Aggregation‐Induced Emission: Materials and Biomedical Applications
Hu, F., Xu, S., & Liu, B. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801350 · Cited by 859
Chemical Quenching of Singlet Oxygen by Carotenoids in Plants
Ramel, F., Birtic, S., Cuiné, S., Triantaphylidès, C., Ravanat, J.-L., & Havaux, M. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.182394 · Cited by 465
Methods for reactive oxygen species (ROS) detection in aqueous environments
Burns, J. M., Cooper, W. J., Ferry, J. L., King, D. W., DiMento, B. P., McNeill, K., Miller, C. J., Miller, W. L., Peake, B. M., Rusak, S. A., et al. (2012) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-012-0251-x · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- Flors, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-19
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1725-1734
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2144197904
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging the production of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescent sensor, Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green(R). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erj181
- The paper
- Flors, C. (2006). Imaging the production of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescent sensor, Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green(R). Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj181
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.