The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives
Open accessAbstract
'Drought' has many meanings in relation to crop production. These range from: statistical (say, the lowest decile of annual rainfall) to a meteorologist; through yield being limited by too little water to an agronomist; to sudden severe water deficits to many molecular biologists. To a farmer, the corresponding management issues, respectively, are risk management (how best to manage a meteorologically drought-prone farm over several years), how best to match cultivar and agronomic operations to the developing growing season, and how best to minimize possible major damage to (say) floral fertility induced by severe water deficits during flowering. All these definitions and the issues they imply are relevant to improving crop production when water is limiting. How can scientists best help? The answers depend on the scales (temporal and spatial) being addressed. Agronomists and breeders, interacting, can help improve components of seasonal water balance in the field, for example, minimizing evaporative losses from the soil surface by better matching the development of a crop to its environment. Physiologists, biochemists, and molecular biologists can help by identifying ways of improving the competence of particular organs. A promising target is floral infertility resulting from water deficits, which results from lesions in tissue, and cellular and molecular processes. Choosing problems whose solutions will have implications in the field and be attractive to farmers requires knowledge of what is important in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Plant Productivity in the Arid and Semiarid Zones
Fischer, R. A., & Turner, N. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.001425 · Cited by 804
Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., & van Herwaarden, A. F. (2002) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0111 · Cited by 727
Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry
Campos, H., Cooper, M., Habben, J. E., Edmeades, G. O., & Schussler, J. R. (2004) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.003 · Cited by 646
Reproductive Development in Grain Crops during Drought
Saini, H. S., & Westgate, M. E. (1999) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60843-3 · Cited by 619
Nixon, L. (2001) · Journal of Roman Studies · doi:10.2307/3184778 · Cited by 578
Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce—from breeding to field management
Passioura, J. (2006) · Agricultural Water Management · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.012 · Cited by 556
Self-citationDust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s
Fite, G. C., & Worster, D. (1980) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1855110 · Cited by 412
Improving wheat grain filling under stress by stem reserve mobilisation
Blum, A. (1997) · Developments in Plant Breeding · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4896-2_19 · Cited by 349
Dust Bowl: The Southern Plains in the 1930s
Ware, J. W., & Worster, D. (1980) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1900523 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from available data?
Pinheiro, C., & Chaves, M. M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq340 · Cited by 1,083
Transgenic approaches for abiotic stress tolerance in plants: retrospect and prospects
Bhatnagar-Mathur, P., Vadez, V., & Sharma, K. K. (2008) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-007-0474-9 · Cited by 606
Quantitative Trait Loci and Crop Performance under Abiotic Stress: Where Do We Stand?: Table I.
Collins, N. C., Tardieu, F., & Tuberosa, R. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.108.118117 · Cited by 559
Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era
Tuberosa, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00347 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Passioura, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-06
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-117
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2148866943
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/erl212
- The paper
- Passioura, J. (2006). The drought environment: physical, biological and agricultural perspectives. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.