The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A root's ability to retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat
Open accessAbstract
Most work on wheat breeding for salt tolerance has focused mainly on excluding Na(+) from uptake and transport to the shoot. However, some recent findings have reported no apparent correlation between leaf Na(+) content and wheat salt tolerance. Thus, it appears that excluding Na(+) by itself is not always sufficient to increase plant salt tolerance and other physiological traits should also be considered. In this work, it was investigated whether a root's ability to retain K(+) may be such a trait, and whether our previous findings for barley can be extrapolated to species following a 'salt exclusion' strategy. NaCl-induced kinetics of K(+) flux from roots of two bread and two durum wheat genotypes, contrasting in their salt tolerance, were measured under laboratory conditions using non-invasive ion flux measuring (the MIFE) technique. These measurements were compared with whole-plant physiological characteristics and yield responses from plants grown under greenhouse conditions. The results show that K(+) flux from the root surface of 6-d-old wheat seedlings in response to salt treatment was highly correlated with major plant physiological characteristics and yield of greenhouse-grown plants. This emphasizes the critical role of K(+) homeostasis in plant salt tolerance and suggests that using NaCl-induced K(+) flux measurements as a physiological 'marker' for salt tolerance may benefit wheat-breeding programmes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
An examination of selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat, barley and triticale genotypes
Rawson, H., Richards, R., & Munns, R. (1988) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar9880759 · Cited by 144
Cited by
The Role of Na+ and K+ Transporters in Salt Stress Adaptation in Glycophytes
Assaha, D. V. M., Ueda, A., Saneoka, H., Al-Yahyai, R., & Yaish, M. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00509 · Cited by 914
Shabala, S., & Pottosin, I. (2014) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/ppl.12165 · Cited by 720
Self-citationEnergy costs of salt tolerance in crop plants
Munns, R., Day, D. A., Fricke, W., Watt, M., Arsova, B., Barkla, B. J., Bose, J., Byrt, C. S., Chen, Z., Foster, K. J., et al. (2020) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15864 · Cited by 517
Self-citationHu, Y., Chen, L., Wang, H., Zhang, L., Wang, F., & Yu, D. (2013) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12159 · Cited by 354
Comparative physiology of elemental distributions in plants
Conn, S., & Gilliham, M. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcq027 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuin, T. A., Betts, S. A., Chalmandrier, R., & Shabala, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2697-2706
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2148650884
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A root's ability to retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/ern128
- The paper
- Cuin, T. A., Betts, S. A., Chalmandrier, R., & Shabala, S. (2008). A root's ability to retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.