The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress
Open accessAbstract
The use of soil and irrigation water with a high content of soluble salts is a major limiting factor for crop productivity in the semi-arid areas of the world. While important physiological insights about the mechanisms of salt tolerance in plants have been gained, the transfer of such knowledge into crop improvement has been limited. The identification and exploitation of soil microorganisms (especially rhizosphere bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi) that interact with plants by alleviating stress opens new alternatives for a pyramiding strategy against salinity, as well as new approaches to discover new mechanisms involved in stress tolerance. Although these mechanisms are not always well understood, beneficial physiological effects include improved nutrient and water uptake, growth promotion, and alteration of plant hormonal status and metabolism. This review aims to evaluate the beneficial effects of soil biota on the plant response to saline stress, with special reference to phytohormonal signalling mechanisms that interact with key physiological processes to improve plant tolerance to the osmotic and toxic components of salinity. Improved plant nutrition is a quite general beneficial effect and may contribute to the maintenance of homeostasis of toxic ions under saline stress. Furthermore, alteration of crop hormonal status to decrease evolution of the growth-retarding and senescence-inducing hormone ethylene (or its precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid), or to maintain source-sink relations, photosynthesis, and biomass production and allocation (by altering indole-3-acetic acid and cytokinin biosynthesis) seem to be promising target processes for soil biota-improved crop salt tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria
Glick, B. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-015 · Cited by 2,649
Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis
Augé, R. M. (2001) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s005720100097 · Cited by 2,210
Flowers, T. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erh003 · Cited by 2,123
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses
MUNNS, R. (1993) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00840.x · Cited by 1,474
Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress
Mayak, S., Tirosh, T., & Glick, B. R. (2004) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009 · Cited by 1,254
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review
Evelin, H., Kapoor, R., & Giri, B. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcp251 · Cited by 1,083
Auxin Transport Promotes Arabidopsis Lateral Root Initiation
Casimiro, I., Marchant, A., Bhalerao, R. P., Beeckman, T., Dhooge, S., Swarup, R., Graham, N., Inzé, D., Sandberg, G., Casero, P. J., et al. (2001) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.13.4.843 · Cited by 1,060
How the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Azospirillum Promotes Plant Growth—A Critical Assessment
Bashan, Y., & de-Bashan, L. E. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)08002-8 · Cited by 953
Cited by
Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants
Calvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 · Cited by 2,294
The Plant Microbiota: Systems-Level Insights and Perspectives
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y., & Vorholt, J. A. (2016) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-034952 · Cited by 846
Insights into plant salt stress signaling and tolerance
Zhou, H., Shi, H., Yang, Y., Feng, X., Chen, X., Xiao, F., Lin, H., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2023.08.007 · Cited by 677
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria
Forni, C., Duca, D., & Glick, B. R. (2017) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-016-3007-x · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodd, I. C., & Perez-Alfocea, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3415-3428
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2076126166
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 19.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/ers033
- The paper
- Dodd, I. C., & Perez-Alfocea, F. (2012). Microbial amelioration of crop salinity stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.