Cited by 77Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant Reproductive Biology

Brassinosteroid action in flowering plants: A Darwinian perspective

Open access
Kutschera, U., Wang, Z.-Y.·2012·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

The year 2012 marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's first botanical book, on the fertilization of orchids (1862), wherein he described pollen grains and outlined his evolutionary principles with respect to plant research. Five decades later, the growth-promoting effect of extracts of Orchid pollen on coleoptile elongation was documented. These studies led to the discovery of a new class of phytohormones, the brassinosteroids (BRs) that were isolated from rapeseed (Brassica napus) pollen. These growth-promoting steroids, which regulate height, fertility, and seed-filling in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), also induce stress- and disease resistance in green algae and angiosperms. The origin and current status of BR-research is described here, with reference to BR-action and -signal transduction, and it is shown that modern high-yield rice varieties with erect leaves are deficient in endogenous BRs. Since brassinosteroids induce pathogen resistance in rice plants and hence can suppress rice blast- and bacterial blight-diseases, genetic manipulation of BR-biosynthesis or -perception may be a means to increase crop production. Basic research on BR activity in plants, such as Arabidopsis and rice, has the potential to increase crop yields further as part of a 21th century 'green biotech-revolution' that can be traced back to Darwin's classical breeding experiments. It is concluded that 'Nothing in brassinosteroid research makes sense except in the light of Darwinian evolution' and the value of basic science is highlighted, with reference to the genetic engineering of better food crops that may become resistant to a variety of plant diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jxb/ers065

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 77

Authors
Kutschera, U., & Wang, Z.-Y.
Affiliations
Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
Corresponding author
Kutschera, U.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
63
Issue
10
Pages
3511-3522
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2159289891
Cited by
77
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 G 11066258)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM066258)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
Keywords
brassinosteroids, brassinosteroid signaling, plant growth promotion, Charles Darwin, rice, disease resistance, rice blast, bacterial blight, crop yield, plant biotechnology, plant hormones, Darwinian evolution
MeSH terms
Biological Evolution, Plant Growth Regulators, Oryza, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Magnoliopsida, Flowers, Brassinosteroids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review