The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening
Open accessAbstract
Fleshy fruits have evolved to be attractive to frugivores in order to enhance seed dispersal, and have become an indispensable part of the human diet. Here we review the recent advances in the understanding of transcriptional regulation of fleshy fruit development and ripening with a focus on tomato. While aspects of fruit development are probably conserved throughout the angiosperms, including the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, it is shown that the likely orthologues of Arabidopsis genes have distinct functions in fleshy fruits. The model for the study of fleshy fruit development is tomato, because of the availability of single gene mutants and transgenic knock-down lines. In other species, our knowledge is often incomplete or absent. Tomato fruit size and shape are co-determined by transcription factors acting during formation of the ovary. Other transcription factors play a role in fruit chloroplast formation, and upon ripening impact quality aspects such as secondary metabolite content. In tomato, the transcription factors NON-RIPENING (NOR), COLORLESS NON-RIPENING (CNR), and RIPENING INHIBITOR (MADS-RIN) in concert with ethylene signalling regulate ripening, possibly in response to a developmental switch. Additional components include TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE1 (TAGL1), APETALA2a (AP2a), and FRUITFULL (FUL1 and FUL2). The links between this highly connected regulatory network and downstream effectors modulating colour, texture, and flavour are still relatively poorly understood. Intertwined with this network is post-transcriptional regulation by fruit-expressed microRNAs targeting several of these transcription factors. This important developmental process is also governed by changes in DNA methylation levels and possibly chromatin remodelling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla
The French–Italian Public Consortium for Grapevine Genome Characterization (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06148 · Cited by 3,767
The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11119 · Cited by 3,289
ESAU, K. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196008000-00031 · Cited by 2,087
The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.)
Velasco, R., Zharkikh, A., Affourtit, J., Dhingra, A., Cestaro, A., Kalyanaraman, A., Fontana, P., Bhatnagar, S. K., Troggio, M., Pruss, D., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.654 · Cited by 2,075
Role of WUSCHEL in Regulating Stem Cell Fate in the Arabidopsis Shoot Meristem
Mayer, K. F. X., Schoof, H., Haecker, A., Lenhard, M., Jürgens, G., & Laux, T. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81703-1 · Cited by 1,702
Virus‐induced gene silencing in tomato
Liu, Y., Schiff, M., & Dinesh‐Kumar, S. P. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01394.x · Cited by 1,654
The genome of the cucumber,Cucumis sativus L
Huang, S., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Li, L., Gu, X., Fan, W., Lucas, W. J., Wang, X., Xie, B., Ni, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.475 · Cited by 1,490
Manning, K., Tör, M., Poole, M., Hong, Y., Thompson, A. J., King, G. J., Giovannoni, J. J., & Seymour, G. B. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1841 · Cited by 1,310
Self-citationGenes directing flower development in Arabidopsis.
Bowman, J. L., Smyth, D. R., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (1989) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.1.1.37 · Cited by 1,271
New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits
Jaakola, L. (2013) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.06.003 · Cited by 1,263
Cited by
The Epigenome and Transcriptional Dynamics of Fruit Ripening
Giovannoni, J., Nguyen, C., Ampofo, B., Zhong, S., & Fei, Z. (2017) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906 · Cited by 474
Bacterial communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere and endosphere of tomato plants
Dong, C.-J., Wang, L.-L., Li, Q., & Shang, Q.-M. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223847 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Karlova, R., Chapman, N., David, K., Angenent, G. C., Seymour, G. B., & de Maagd, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-07-28
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4527-4541
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2143321978
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 27.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jxb/eru316
- The paper
- Karlova, R., Chapman, N., David, K., Angenent, G. C., Seymour, G. B., & de Maagd, R. A. (2014). Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.