Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 74Family and Matrimonial LawIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawAfrican Studies and Ethnography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

NEITHER CUSTOMARY NOR LEGAL: AFRICAN CUSTOMARY LAW IN AN ERA OF FAMILY LAW REFORM

CHANOCK, MARTIN·1989·"International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family"

Abstract

Family law in Africa appears to involve a clash between the customary law and the modernizing ambitions of post-colonial states. An adequate conceptualizing of the customary law is, therefore, a necessary part of the comprehension of the politics of family law reform in modern Africa. The relatively recent overthrow of the colonial states has made it an important part of the symbolical politics of modern Africa to reassert African values and institutions. Because of the difficulties of utilizing the customary in other realms of law, family law has borne the burden of an invocation of custom which has served to obscure the realities of gender and generational conflict in modern Africa. The African family laws which were established during the colonial situation were, however, the product of the colonial state and of far-reaching economic changes. Processes of state sponsored legalization, and the disruption of family formation and workings by the money economy and labour migration, led to the dominance of a new version of customary law which suited the white administrators and African male elders who ruled colonial society. This version of the customary law is not the only one derivable from the ways in which people lived their lives in which alternative values were demonstrated. By re-integrating the history of African family law with that of other parts of the world we can escape the false dichotomies which have dominated discussions of the subject and free ourselves of the…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/lawfam/3.1.72

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 74

Metadata

Authors
CHANOCK, M.
Affiliations
Ford Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
CHANOCK, MARTIN
Venue
"International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family"
Published
1989
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
72-88
ISSN
  • 0950-4109 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-9939
  • 1464-3707
OpenAlex
W1986167183
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Law Policy and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
Keywords
African customary law, family law reform, colonialism, postcolonial state, gender conflict, intergenerational conflict, monetary economy, labor migration, traditionalism, African cultural identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEITHER CUSTOMARY NOR LEGAL: AFRICAN CUSTOMARY LAW IN AN ERA OF FAMILY LAW REFORM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/lawfam/3.1.72
The paper
CHANOCK, M. (1989). NEITHER CUSTOMARY NOR LEGAL: AFRICAN CUSTOMARY LAW IN AN ERA OF FAMILY LAW REFORM. "International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family". https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/3.1.72

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.