Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovered Memories and False Memories

Martin A. Conway·1997·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

Recensionsholism as a psychopathology is limited to the conclusions of Freud, Adler and Menninger.Has anybody made a more recent contribution?This portion of the book does not shy away from statements against phenomena such as

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/med:psych/9780198523864.001.0001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Conway, M. A.
Corresponding author
Martin A. Conway
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
1997-03
OpenAlex
W2057385467
Cited by
172
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.11
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
recovered memory, false memory, psychopathology, Sigmund Freud, Adler, memory distortion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovered Memories and False Memories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/med:psych/9780198523864.001.0001
The paper
Conway, M. A. (1997). Recovered Memories and False Memories. Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/med%3Apsych/9780198523864.001.0001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.