Cited by 1,133Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Schacter, Daniel L.·1999·American Psychologist

Abstract

Though often reliable, human memory is also fallible. This article examines how and why memory can get us into trouble. It is suggested that memory's misdeeds can be classified into 7 basic "sins": transience, absentmindedness, blocking, misattribution, suggestibility, bias, and persistence. The first three sins involve different types of forgetting, the next three refer to different types of distortions, and the final sin concerns intrusive recollections that are difficult to forget. Evidence is reviewed concerning each of the 7 sins from relevant sectors of psychology (cognitive, social, and clinical) and from cognitive neuroscience studies that include patients with focal brain damage or make use of recently developed neuroimaging techniques. Although the 7 sins may appear to reflect flaws in system design, it is argued instead that they are by-products of otherwise adaptive features of memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.54.3.182

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People's memories and beliefs are highly malleable.

    “First, people’s memories and beliefs are highly malleable (Chater, 2018; Schacter, 1999).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Schacter, 1999

  • Hypnotic suggestions can inflate a person's confidence in the accuracy of their own (false) memories (imagery inflation), affecting the rewriting of their memory.

    “Additionally, hypnotic suggestions can inflate the person's confidence of the accuracy of their own (false) memories (imagery inflation), strongly affecting the rewriting of their memory (Heaps and Nash, 1999; Schacter, 1999; Wagstaff et al., 2004; Whitehouse et al., 1988).”
  • Imagery and unintentional suggestions may lead to the formation of false memories due to the source misattribution effect.

    “It has been suggested that imagery and unintentional suggestions may lead to the formation of false memories (Arbuthnott et al., 2001; Strange and Takarangi, 2015) due to the source misattribution effect (Schacter, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schacter, Daniel L.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1999
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
182-203
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2089315399
Cited by
1,133
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 50
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
memory errors, forgetting, transience, blocking, misattribution, suggestibility, memory bias, memory persistence, memory distortion, adaptive memory, neuroimaging of memory
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neurosciences, Psychology, Tomography, Emission-Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review