Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 880

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction: The Bishop Score

Ajewole, C. Sola, Abbott, Jodi F.·2021·50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know

Abstract

This article reviews the commonly known Bishop score and how it was derived from the Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction study. The study observed women in spontaneous labor, their initial cervical exams, as well as the development and implementation of pelvic scoring for labor induction. It reviews the components of the original Bishop score and compares it to a Simplified Bishop score and how their applications compare when determining the likelihood of success of vaginal delivery. It demonstrates how a cervix is determined to be favorable or unfavorable. This article includes a figure that displays time to delivery and the content is intended for providers in obstetrics and gynecology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/med/9780190947088.003.0011

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 880

Metadata

Authors
Ajewole, C. S., & Abbott, J. F.
Venue
50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know
Published
2021-01
Pages
60-63
OpenAlex
W3127540091
Cited by
880
References
0
FWCI
56.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction: The Bishop Score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/med/9780190947088.003.0011
The paper
Ajewole, C. S., & Abbott, J. F. (2021). Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction: The Bishop Score. 50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190947088.003.0011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.