Cited by 35Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

The Role of Religion/Spirituality in Coping with Cancer: Evidence, Assessment, and Intervention

Fitchett, George, Canada, Andrea L.·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/med/9780195367430.003.0059

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many pathways have been proposed to explain how religion and spirituality may exert salutary influences on well-being.

    “Many pathways have been proposed to explain how religion and spirituality may exert salutary influences on well-being (Clements & Ermakova, 2012; Fitchett & Canada, 2010; Lee & Newberg, 2005; Levin & Vanderpool, 1989; Masters, 2008; Oman & Thoresen, 2005; Park, 2007; see Aldwin et al., 2014, for a review).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitchett, G., & Canada, A. L.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Published
2010-04
Pages
440-446
OpenAlex
W2495886549
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
religion, spirituality, cancer, coping, spiritual assessment, intervention, religious coping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review