The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mental Health Law and Human Rights
Abstract
Michael Perlin and Eva Szeli consider the relationship between human rights and the law, and specifically, the relatively recent meeting of mental health law and human rights law. They note the neglect of human rights of people with disabilities for decades by international human rights protection agencies. Although recent political, legal, social, and cultural developments have helped shift the environment so as to support a movement that ‘ extends’ rights to this population, these rights are often ignored or granted only on paper. They argue the cause is sanism: an irrational prejudice akin to other prejudices of racism, sexism, homophobia, and ethnic bigotry, that infects jurisprudence and lawyering practices, that is largely invisible and socially acceptable, based predominantly upon stereotype, myth, superstition, and deindividualization, is sustained and perpetuated by ‘ordinary common sense’ (OCS) and heuristic reasoning in an unconscious response to events in everyday life and in the legal process. They issue the challenge to give life to international human rights for this population.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rights of persons with a mental health condition received international acknowledgement through the MI Principles adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1991.
“This was through the Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care (the Mental Illness Principles or MI Principles), adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1991 22,23 .”
From Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs (2024) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Galderisi, S., Appelbaum, P. S., Gill, N., Gooding, P., Herrman, H., Melillo, A., Myrick, K., Pathare, S., Savage, M., Szmukler, G., et al. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21230 · Cited by 76
Perlin, M. L., Birgden, A., & Gledhill, K. (2009) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.90 · Cited by 7
Self-citationThe ‘madness’ of accessing justice: legal mobilisation, welfare benefits and empowerment
Vanhala, L. C., & Kinghan, J. (2022) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2022.2028407 · Cited by 5
Strange bedfellows? Nurses as Responsible Clinicians under the Mental Health Act (England & Wales)
Veitch, P., & Oates, J. (2016) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12366 · Cited by 4
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119945352.ch2 · Cited by 4
Sanghi, S., & JASWAL, R. T. (2021) · Asian Journal of International Law · doi:10.1017/s2044251321000576 · Cited by 6
Perlin, M. L., & Gallagher, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3203020 · Cited by 3
Self-citationThe Application of the CRPD and Other International Human Rights Instruments in Mental Health Care
Gill, N., & Sartorius, N. (2024) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-52179-9_2 · Cited by 1
Ouliaris, C., & Gill, N. (2025) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2024.2444286 · Cited by 1
Perlin, M. L., Lynch, A. J., Frailing, K., et al. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2692109 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Perlin, M. L., & Szeli, É.
- ORCID
- Perlin, Michael L.
- Venue
- Mental Health and Human Rights
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2012-06
- Pages
- 80-94
- OpenAlex
- W2476914678
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- mental health law, human rights, people with disabilities, sanism, prejudice, international human rights protection, disability rights, deindividuation, heuristic reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review