Child and Adolescent Conduct Problems
Abstract
This chapter explores child and adolescent conduct problems (CP). It provides an overview of several key findings from research on CP in children and adolescents and highlight several findings that have the most direct relevance to the assessment process. Specifically, the chapter focuses on research illustrating the great heterogeneity in the types, severity, and course of CP in youth, as well as the frequent co-occurring problems in adjustment that often accompany CP. It also summarizes research showing important dispositional and contextual risk factors that have been related to CP and that could play an important role in the development or maintenance of CP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BASC rating scales have been endorsed as evidence-based instruments for assessment of conduct problems and for monitoring and evaluation of treatment outcomes.
“BASC rating scales have been endorsed as evidence-based instruments for assessment of conduct problems and for monitoring and evaluation of treatment outcomes (Frick & McMahon, 2008; Kamphaus & Frick, 2005).”
From Perceived Parent–Child Relations, Conduct Problems, and Clinical Improvement Following the Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Frick & McMahon, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Booker, J. A., Ollendick, T. H., Dunsmore, J. C., & Greene, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0323-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frick, P. J., & McMahon, R. J.
- Venue
- A Guide to Assessments that Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2008-03
- Pages
- 41-66
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
