Cited by 12Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesDigital Mental Health Interventions

The English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Program

Clark, David M.·2015·Oxford Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Chapter 4 describes the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Program in the United Kingdom, a sweeping national effort to ensure availability of evidence-based treatments by providing intensive training and utilizing a stepped-care model consistent with best-practice recommendations for the treatment of anxiety and depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/med:psych/9780195389050.003.0004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, D. M.
Corresponding author
Clark, David M.
Venue
Oxford Clinical Psychology
Published
2015-08
OpenAlex
W4246350170
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, stepped care, mental health service delivery, anxiety disorders, depression, evidence-based treatment, psychologist training, mental health policy, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review