The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benign schizotypy?
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the benign features of the schizotypal personality trait, and specifically the proposition that it may underlie what will be referred to as ‘spiritual experience’. It discusses quantifying the spiritual experience, studies and measurement tools, and illustrative case studies of ‘benign schizotypy’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Jackson et al 13,14 found that intense spiritual experiences reported by some individuals could not be distinguished phenomenologically from psychotic symptoms; the differences lay in the interpretation and meaning given to these experiences, and in their emotional and behavioural correlates.”
From Clinical, socio‐demographic and psychological characteristics in individuals with persistent psychotic experiences with and without a “need for care” (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
THE CONTINUITY OF PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES IN THE GENERAL POPULATION
Johns, L. C., & van Os, J. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00103-9 · Cited by 960
“The existence of lesser states on a distributed continuum in the population may, perhaps, instead of a forme fruste of disease, be better thought of as a risk factor for what clinicians would call disorder (Claridge, 1994, 1997b).”
BackgroundInfluentialPsychosis and autism as diametrical disorders of the social brain
Crespi, B. J., & Badcock, C. R. (2008) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x08004214 · Cited by 636
“Remarkably, a recent study of Asperger syndrome BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2008) 31:3 247”
BackgroundYung, A. R., Nelson, B., Baker, K., Buckby, J. A., Baksheev, G., & Cosgrave, E. M. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00048670802607188 · Cited by 371
Armando, M., Nelson, B., Yung, A. R., Ross, M., Birchwood, M. J., Girardi, P., & Nastro, P. F. (2010) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.001 · Cited by 287
“As the PLEs belonging to the first two categories may be considered to be those that cause the greatest concern in terms of clinical care (McCreery and Claridge, 1996; Jackson, 1997), an effort is required to increase our ability to detect PLEs in these two categories, which reflect a more fundamental, underlying dist…”
BackgroundSpiritual Experience and Psychopathology
Fulford, K. W. M., & Jackson, M. C. (1997) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.1997.0002 · Cited by 266
“The original study (Jackson 1991) included a comparison of five subjects selected as above (the "undiagnosed group") with five who had recovered from major psychoses but nonetheless interpreted their experiences in strongly spiritual terms (the "diagnosed group").”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, M.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Michael
- Venue
- Schizotypy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1997-05
- Pages
- 227-250
- OpenAlex
- W3016507149
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- schizotypy, spiritual experience, case studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
