The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychologists' Desk Reference
Abstract
Abstract This online resource for mental health practitioners presents a variety of information required in daily practice in one easy-to-use resource. Covering the entire spectrum of practice issues–from diagnostic codes, practice guidelines, treatment principles, and report checklists, to insight and advice from today's most respected clinicians–this peerless reference gives access to the whole range of current knowledge. It covers assessment and diagnosis, testing and psychometrics, treatment and psychotherapy, biology and pharmacotherapy, self-help resources, ethical and legal issues, forensic practice, financial and insurance matters, and prevention and consultation. Chapters are clearly written by master clinicians and include easy-to-read checklists and tables as well as helpful advice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A group with less than five members is not recommended [78].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions.
Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410 · Cited by 5,947
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016
Bullard, M. J., Musgrave, E., Warren, D., Unger, B., Skeldon, T., Grierson, R., van der Linde, E., & Swain, J. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1017/cem.2017.365 · Cited by 510
Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760600619567 · Cited by 455
Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9380-0 · Cited by 444
Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000022 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Venue
- Oxford University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2013-07
- OpenAlex
- W1582909952
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- clinical psychology practice, diagnosis codes, clinical guidelines, psychotherapy, psychometrics, psychological assessment, pharmacotherapy, self-help, legal and ethical issues, forensic practice, prevention, consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
