The Temptation of Legitimacy: Lilith’s Adoption and Adaption in Contemporary Feminist Spirituality and Their Meanings
Abstract
Even thousands of years later, Lilith, the demonness, still tempts many. Her image, which appears in ancient tradition as a personification of the forbidden temptation, turns up and is manifest in our time in secular, religious, spiritual, and post-secular contemporary circles1 as an alluring and relevant character. What purposes or ends does her image serve nowadays? Why is she once again referred to and appropriated? What is there about her story that has had such wide appeal to so many in the feminist movement and in various forms of alternative spiritual discourse over the past few decades? Does she represent a certain value, leadership, spiritual perception, or a certain feminist movement? To answer these questions, I would like to review how Lilith’s image is utilized in contemporary feminist spiritual discourse, and to analyze the values and ideas embodied in these appearances. I will present the different and varied ways in which Lilith’s image reappears, while attempting to understand what today’s admirers view as her unique contribution to their spiritual and/or feminist purposes. I will begin with a short review of Lilith’s image in ancient traditions, particularly the Judeo-Christian tradition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the myth, Lilith was made from the same clay as Adam, which marked her as his equal.
“According to this story, Lilith was made from the same clay as Adam, which marked her as his equal.”
From Terrors of the house and field: saccharine gothic and Caribbean plantation literatures (2026) · cites this paper as Shapiro 2019
Conflict arose between Adam and Lilith as Adam sought to exercise dominance over Lilith, who fled the Garden of Eden to gain her independence.
“Yet, conflict arose between the couple as Adam sought to exercise dominance over Lilith, who fled the Garden of Eden to gain her independence (Shapiro 2019).”
From Terrors of the house and field: saccharine gothic and Caribbean plantation literatures (2026) · cites this paper as Shapiro 2019
Cites
Saving the Modern SoulTherapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help
Illouz, E. (2008) · doi:10.1525/california/9780520224469.001.0001 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Terrors of the house and field: saccharine gothic and Caribbean plantation literatures
Hugo, E. (2026) · Interventions · doi:10.1080/1369801x.2025.2555838
- Authors
- Ruah-Midbar Shapiro, M.
- Affiliations
- ZEFAT ACADEMIC COLLEGE
- Venue
- Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-22
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-143
- ISSN
- 0276-1114 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3273
- OpenAlex
- W2941595704
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Judaism - A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
- Keywords
- Lilith, feminist spirituality, feminist movements, legitimacy, temptation, Judeo-Christian tradition, post-secularism, alternative spirituality, myth reception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review