Cited by 13Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen Control

In vivo development of fluconazole resistance in serial Cryptococcus gattii isolates from a cat

Sykes, Jane E., Hodge, Greg, Singapuri, Anil, Yang, Mai Lee, Gelli, Angie, Thompson, George R.·2016·Medical Mycology

Abstract

Elevated fluconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are more frequently observed in Cryptococcus gattii compared to C. neoformans isolates; however, the development of in vivo resistance and the molecular mechanisms responsible have not been reported for this species. We report a case of Cryptococcus gattii (molecular type VGIII) that developed reduced susceptibility to fluconazole during therapy and delineate the molecular mechanisms responsible. Multilocus sequence typing and quantitative DNA analysis of the pre- and post-treatment isolates was performed using well-characterized methods. Pre- and post-treatment clinical isolates were confirmed isogenic, and no differences in ERG11 or PDR11 sequences were found. qPCR found an overexpression of ERG11 and the efflux pump PDR11 in the resistant isolate compared to the isolate collected prior to initiation of antifungal therapy. Reversion to wild-type susceptibility was observed when maintained in antifungal-free media confirming the in vivo development of heteroresistance. The in vivo development of heteroresistance to fluconazole in our patient with C. gattii is secondary to overexpression of the efflux pump PDR11 and the drug target ERG11. Additional work in other clinical isolates with elevated fluconazole MICs is warranted to evaluate the frequency of heteroresistance versus point mutations as a cause of resistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mmy/myw104

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overexpression of the efflux pump PDR11 contributed greatly to induced fluconazole heteroresistance in serial isolates from the same patient.

    “Sykes et al. obtained serial isolates from the same patient and found that overexpression of the efflux pump PDR11 contributed greatly to the induced fluconazole heteroresistance [146].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sykes, J. E., Hodge, G., Singapuri, A., Yang, M. L., Gelli, A., & Thompson, G. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Thompson, George R.
Venue
Medical Mycology
Published
2016-10-07
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
myw104
ISSN
  • 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-3786
  • 1460-2709
OpenAlex
W2528544669
Cited by
13
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Mycology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Cryptococcus gattii, fluconazole resistance, heteroresistance, antifungal therapy, feline cryptococcosis, minimum inhibitory concentration
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Cats, Cryptococcosis, Female, Fungal Proteins, Genotype, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Fluconazole, Mycological Typing Techniques, Gene Expression Profiling, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Cryptococcus gattii, Molecular Typing, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review