Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

M/L and velocity anisotropy from observations of spherical galaxies, or must M87 have a massive black hole?

Open access
Binney, J., Mamon, G. A.·1982·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

An algorithm is developed that determines whether a given set of photometric and spectroscopic observations of a spherical galaxy are consistent with the mass-to-light ratio in the galaxy being constant. If such a model is possible, the value of the mass-to-light ratio and the values of the two independent components of velocity dispersion at each radius are determined. Tests of the algorithm demonstrate its consistency and accuracy when applied to pseudo-data generated from a variety of theoretical models. When the data do not extend to very great radii and must be extrapolated arbitrarily, qualitatively correct results are obtained. The algorithm is applied to M87. The deconvolution technique of Lucy (1974) is used to correct the photometry of Young et al. (1978) for the effects of seeing and a point light source. Velocity dispersion profiles consistent with the observations of Sargent et al. (1978) and of Dressler (1980) combine with the photometry to yield physically plausible models that have constant mass-to-light ratio. |$M/{L}_\text{V}=7.6\,\text{if}\,{A}_\text{v}=0.14$| and D = 16 Mpc. The models returned by different dispersion profiles all involve a tight star cluster at r < 100 pc, in which the velocity dispersion is highly anisotropic towards the outside. The main body of the galaxy, which dominates the light beyond r = 200 pc, has only modest velocity dispersion anisotropy. The constant mass-to-light models of M87 discussed here are very different from that proposed by Duncan & Wheeler (1980) in which the velocity dispersion in the main body of the galaxy is extremely anisotropic. We believe it is difficult to modify their model to conform with the observations of M87 at |$R\gt 80^{\prime{}\prime}$|⁠. The models derived here share important features with those proposed by Gurzadyan & Ozernoi (1980) and by Dressler (1980).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/200.2.361

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Binney, J., & Mamon, G. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1982-09-01
Volume
200
Issue
2
Pages
361-375
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1963754183
Cited by
396
References
0
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M/L and velocity anisotropy from observations of spherical galaxies, or must M87 have a massive black hole? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/200.2.361
The paper
Binney, J., & Mamon, G. A. (1982). M/L and velocity anisotropy from observations of spherical galaxies, or must M87 have a massive black hole? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/200.2.361

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.