Cited by 128Dark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter from groups and clusters of galaxies

Open access
Sagunski, Laura, Gad-Nasr, Sophia, Colquhoun, Brian, Robertson, Andrew, Tulin, Sean·2021·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We probe the self-interactions of dark matter with relaxed galaxy groups and clusters using observational data from strong and weak lensing and stellar kinematics. Our analysis uses the Jeans formalism and considers a wider range of systematic effects than in previous work, including adiabatic contraction and stellar anisotropy, to robustly constrain the self-interaction cross section. For both groups and clusters, our results show a mild preference for a nonzero cross section compared with cold collisionless dark matter. Our groups result, σ/ m =0.5±0.2 cm 2 /g, places the first constraint on self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) at an intermediate scale M 200 ∼ 10 14 M ⊙ between galaxies and massive clusters. For massive clusters with M 200 ∼ 10 15 M ⊙ , our result is σ/ m =0.19±0.09 cm 2 /g, with an upper limit of σ / m < 0.35 cm 2 /g (95% CL) . Thus, our results disfavor a velocity-independent cross section of order 1 cm 2 /g or larger needed to impact small scale structure problems in galaxies, but are consistent with a velocity-dependent cross section that decreases with increasing scattering velocity. Comparing the cross sections with and without the effect of adiabatic contraction, we find that adiabatic contraction produces slightly larger values for our data sample, but they are consistent at the 1σ level. Finally, to validate our approach, we apply our Jeans analysis to a sample of mock data generated from SIDM-plus-baryons simulations with σ/ m = 1 cm 2 /g. This is the first test of the Jeans model at the level of stellar and lensing observables directly measured from simulations. We find our analysis gives a robust determination of the cross section, as well as consistently inferring the true baryon and dark matter density profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/01/024

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently, the most stringent absolute constraints on the SIDM cross section come from strong lensing of galaxy clusters, suggesting σ/m ≲ 0.1 cm^2/g.

    “Currently, the most stringent absolute constraints on the SIDM cross section come from strong lensing of galaxy clusters, which suggest σ/m ≲ 0 . 1 cm 2 / g [17, 18].”

    From Constraint on dark matter self-interaction from combined strong lensing and stellar kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    In the discussion following Table III (page unavailable), the paper says strong-lensing-only studies constrained σ/m < 1 cm²/g and describes earlier 0.1 cm²/g limits as overestimated. Its own stronger cluster limit is σ/m < 0.35 cm²/g at 95% confidence and also uses stellar kinematics, so it does not support the claimed strong-lensing limit of ≲0.1 cm²/g. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sagunski et al. [17] found a clear preference for non-zero SIDM cross-sections, with σ/m = 0.19 ± 0.09 cm^2/g at cluster scales and σ/m = 0.5 ± 0.2 cm^2/g at group scales.

    “Their results show a clear preference for non-zero cross-sections, with σ/m = 0 . 19 ± 0 . 09 cm 2 / g at cluster scales, and σ/m = 0 . 5 ± 0 . 2 cm 2 / g at group scales.”

    From Constraint on dark matter self-interaction from combined strong lensing and stellar kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The table reproduced in V. Conclusions gives the quoted group and cluster cross-sections and uncertainties. But that section calls the preference for a nonzero cross-section “mild,” not clear; B. Cross sections likewise says it is “not very strong.” No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SIDM cross-section must be velocity-dependent if dwarf rotation curves are to be explained by this mechanism.

    “The discrepancy in the size of the cross-section implied by cluster and dwarf galaxy observations suggests that the SIDM cross-section must necessarily be a velocitydependent interaction if we wish to explain dwarf rotation curves through this mechanism.”

    From Constraint on dark matter self-interaction from combined strong lensing and stellar kinematics in MACS J0138-2155 (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Conclusions say that cluster results combined with galaxy-scale observations are consistent with a cross-section that decreases as scattering velocity increases. The Cross sections section says velocity-dependent models are favored over contact-type interactions and gives a model consistent with dwarf rotation curves. Neither section establishes that velocity dependence is strictly necessary, so “must necessarily” overstates the paper’s conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SIDM cross-section constraint is competitive with previous cluster-scale limits.

    “This constraint, derived from the most detailed single-system analysis to date, is competitive with previous cluster-scale limits while demonstrating the power of combining complementary gravitational probes.”
  • There is good agreement between our results and those of [17, 18].

    “We also note that there is good agreement between our results and those of [17, 18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. F. Zwicky, Helvetica Physica Acta 6, 110 (1933).
  2. S. Smith, ApJ 83, 23 (1936). · DOI
  3. H. J. Rood, T. L. Page, E. C. Kintner, and I. R. King, ApJ 175, 627 (1972). · DOI
  4. D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zarit- sky, Astrophys. J. Lett. 648, L109 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608407 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. S. W. Randall, M. Markevitch, D. Clowe, A. H. Gonzalez, and M. Bradac, Astrophys. J. 679, 1173 (2008), arXiv:0704.0261 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016), arXiv:1502.01589 [astro- ph.CO]. · DOI
  7. J. Dubinski and R. G. Carlberg, Astrophys. J. 378, 496 (1991). · DOI
  8. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996), arXiv:astro- ph/9508025 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 490, 493 (1997), arXiv:astro- ph/9611107 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. R. A. Flores and J. R. Primack, Astrophys. J. Lett. 427, L1 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9402004 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  11. B. Moore, Nature 370, 629 (1994). · DOI
  12. S. S. McGaugh and W. J. G. de Blok, Astrophys. J. 499, 41 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9801123 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  13. W. J. G. de Blok, S. S. McGaugh, A. Bosma, and V. C. Rubin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 552, L23 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0103102 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  14. S.-H. Oh, W. J. G. de Blok, E. Brinks, F. Walter, and R. C. Kennicutt, Jr, Astron. J. 141, 193 (2011), arXiv:1011.0899 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  15. J. F. Navarro, V. R. Eke, and C. S. Frenk, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 283, L72 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9610187 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  16. F. Governato et al., Nature 463, 203 (2010), arXiv:0911.2237 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  17. R. Kuzio de Naray, G. D. Martinez, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, Astrophys. J. Lett. 710, L161 (2010), arXiv:0912.3518 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  18. K. A. Oman et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 3650 (2015), arXiv:1504.01437 [astro- ph.GA]. · DOI
  19. I. M. Santos-Santos, A. Di Cintio, C. B. Brook, A. Macciò, A. Dutton, and R. Domínguez- Tenreiro, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473, 4392 (2018), arXiv:1706.04202 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  20. M. Kaplinghat, T. Ren, and H.-B. Yu, JCAP 2006, 027 (2020), arXiv:1911.00544 [astro- ph.GA]. · DOI
  21. J. Kormendy and K. C. Freeman, Proceedings, IAU Symposium 220: Dark Matter in Galaxies: Sydney, Australia, July 21-25, 2003, (2004), [Submitted to: ASP Conf. Ser.(2004); IAU Symp.220,377(2004)], arXiv:astro-ph/0407321 [astro-ph]. · arXiv
  22. F. Donato, G. Gentile, P. Salucci, C. F. Martins, M. I. Wilkinson, G. Gilmore, E. K. Grebel, A. Koch, and R. Wyse, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 397, 1169 (2009), arXiv:0904.4054 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  23. F. Lelli, S. S. McGaugh, J. M. Schombert, and M. S. Pawlowski, Astrophys. J. 836, 152 (2017), arXiv:1610.08981 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  24. J. T. Kleyna, M. I. Wilkinson, G. Gilmore, and N. W. Evans, Astrophys. J. Lett. 588, L21 (2003), [Erratum: Astrophys. J. Lett.589,L59(2003)], arXiv:astro-ph/0304093 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  25. M. G. Walker and J. Penarrubia, Astrophys. J. 742, 20 (2011), arXiv:1108.2404 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  26. M. Boylan-Kolchin, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 415, L40 (2011), arXiv:1103.0007 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  27. A. R. Wetzel, P. F. Hopkins, J.-h. Kim, C.-A. Faucher-Giguere, D. Keres, and E. Quataert, Astrophys. J. Lett. 827, L23 (2016), arXiv:1602.05957 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  28. L. E. Strigari, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 838, 123 (2017), arXiv:1406.6079 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  29. D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3760 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9909386 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rept. 730, 1 (2018), arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. M. Kaplinghat, R. E. Keeley, T. Linden, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 021302 (2014), arXiv:1311.6524 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  32. M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, C. Simpson, and A. Jenkins, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 444, 3684 (2014), arXiv:1405.5216 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  33. M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 041302 (2016), arXiv:1508.03339 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  34. P. Creasey, O. Sameie, L. V. Sales, H.-B. Yu, M. Vogelsberger, and J. Zavala, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 468, 2283 (2017), arXiv:1612.03903 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  35. O. D. Elbert, J. S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, A. S. Graus, and M. Rocha, Astrophys. J. 853, 109 (2018), arXiv:1609.08626 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  36. A. Robertson et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476, L20 (2018), arXiv:1711.09096 [astro- ph.CO]. · DOI
  37. A. Kamada, M. Kaplinghat, A. B. Pace, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 111102 (2017), arXiv:1611.02716 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  38. T. Ren, A. Kwa, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. X9, 031020 (2019), arXiv:1808.05695 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger, and M. G. Walker, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431, L20 (2013), arXiv:1211.6426 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. M. Valli and H.-B. Yu, Nat. Astron. 2, 907 (2018), arXiv:1711.03502 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  41. E. O. Nadler, A. Banerjee, S. Adhikari, Y.-Y. Mao, and R. H. Wechsler, Astrophys. J. 896, 112 (2020), arXiv:2001.08754 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  42. F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, J. Zavala, T. Bringmann, M. Vogelsberger, and C. Pfrom- mer, Phys. Rev. D93, 123527 (2016), arXiv:1512.05344 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  43. F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, M. T. Frandsen, and S. Sarkar, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 437, 2865 (2014), arXiv:1308.3419 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. A. Robertson, R. Massey, and V. Eke, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 569 (2017), arXiv:1605.04307 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. S. Y. Kim, A. H. G. Peter, and D. Wittman, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 469, 1414 (2017), arXiv:1608.08630 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. J. Miralda-Escude, Astrophys. J. 564, 60 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0002050 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  47. M. Meneghetti, N. Yoshida, M. Bartelmann, L. Moscardini, V. Springel, G. Tormen, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 325, 435 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0011405 [astro- ph]. · DOI
  48. N. Yoshida, V. Springel, S. D. M. White, and G. Tormen, Astrophys. J. Lett. 544, L87 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0006134 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  49. A. Robertson, D. Harvey, R. Massey, V. Eke, I. G. McCarthy, M. Jauzac, B. Li, and J. Schaye, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488, 3646 (2019), arXiv:1810.05649 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  50. A. H. G. Peter, M. Rocha, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430, 105 (2013), arXiv:1208.3026 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  51. T. Brinckmann, J. Zavala, D. Rapetti, S. H. Hansen, and M. Vogelsberger, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474, 746 (2018), arXiv:1705.00623 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  52. A. Banerjee, S. Adhikari, N. Dalal, S. More, and A. Kravtsov, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020, 024 (2020), arXiv:1906.12026 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  53. D. J. Sand, T. Treu, and R. S. Ellis, Astrophys. J. Lett. 574, L129 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0207048 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  54. D. J. Sand, T. Treu, G. P. Smith, and R. S. Ellis, Astrophys. J. 604, 88 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0309465 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  55. A. B. Newman, T. Treu, R. S. Ellis, D. J. Sand, C. Nipoti, J. Richard, and E. Jullo, Astrophys. J. 765, 24 (2013), arXiv:1209.1391 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  56. A. B. Newman, T. Treu, R. S. Ellis, and D. J. Sand, Astrophys. J. 765, 25 (2013), arXiv:1209.1392 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  57. M. Schaller, C. S. Frenk, R. G. Bower, T. Theuns, J. Trayford, R. A. Crain, M. Furlong, J. Schaye, C. D. Vecchia, and I. G. McCarthy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452, 343 (2015), arXiv:1409.8297 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  58. A. B. Newman, R. S. Ellis, and T. Treu, Astrophys. J. 814, 26 (2015). · DOI
  59. O. Y. Gnedin, A. V. Kravtsov, A. A. Klypin, and D. Nagai, Astrophys. J. 616, 16 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0406247 [astro-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. O. Y. Gnedin, D. Ceverino, N. Y. Gnedin, A. A. Klypin, A. V. Kravtsov, R. Levine, D. Nagai, and G. Yepes, Submitted to: Astrophys. J. (2011), arXiv:1108.5736 [astro-ph.CO]. · arXiv
  61. M. Rocha, A. H. G. Peter, J. S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, J. Onorbe, and L. A. Moustakas, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430, 81 (2013), arXiv:1208.3025 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  62. O. D. Elbert, J. S. Bullock, S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Rocha, J. OÃśorbe, and A. H. G. Peter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 453, 29 (2015), arXiv:1412.1477 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI · Paper page
  63. A. Sokolenko, K. Bondarenko, T. Brinckmann, J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger, T. Bringmann, and A. Boyarsky, JCAP 1812, 038 (2018), arXiv:1806.11539 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  64. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D87, 115007 (2013), arXiv:1302.3898 [hep-ph]. · DOI · Paper page
  65. A. Robertson, R. Massey, and V. Eke, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 467, 4719 (2017), arXiv:1612.03906 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  66. P. Colin, V. Avila-Reese, O. Valenzuela, and C. Firmani, Astrophys. J. 581, 777 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0205322 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  67. C. S. Kochanek and M. J. White, Astrophys. J. 543, 514 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003483 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  68. D. P. Stark, M. Auger, V. Belokurov, T. Jones, B. E. Robertson, R. S. Ellis, D. J. Sand, A. Moiseev, W. Eagle, and T. Myers, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436, 1040 (2013), arXiv:1302.2663 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  69. S. S. Allam, D. L. Tucker, H. Lin, H. T. Diehl, J. Annis, E. J. Buckley-Geer, and J. A. Frieman, Astrophys. J. Lett. 662, L51 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0611138 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  70. M. Limousin et al., Astron. Astrophys. 502, 445 (2009), arXiv:0812.1033 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  71. E. Munari, A. Biviano, S. Borgani, G. Murante, and D. Fabjan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430, 2638 (2013), arXiv:1301.1682 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  72. J. Binney and G. A. Mamon, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 200, 361 (1982). · DOI
  73. M. Cappellari, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 390, 71 (2008), arXiv:0806.0042 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  74. A. D. Ludlow, J. F. Navarro, R. E. Angulo, M. Boylan-Kolchin, V. Springel, C. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441, 378 (2014), arXiv:1312.0945 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  75. A. A. Dutton and A. V. MacciÚ, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441, 3359 (2014), arXiv:1402.7073 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  76. A. Rodriguez-Puebla, P. Behroozi, J. Primack, A. Klypin, C. Lee, and D. Hellinger, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 462, 893 (2016), arXiv:1602.04813 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  77. C. Giocoli, M. Meneghetti, R. B. Metcalf, S. Ettori, and L. Moscardini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 440, 1899 (2014), arXiv:1311.1205 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  78. J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151301 (2010), arXiv:0911.0422 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  79. M. R. Buckley and P. J. Fox, Phys. Rev. D81, 083522 (2010), arXiv:0911.3898 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  80. A. Loeb and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 171302 (2011), arXiv:1011.6374 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  81. L. G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann, and C. Pfrommer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 231301 (2012), arXiv:1205.5809 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  82. S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 111301 (2013), arXiv:1210.0900 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  83. X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 071103 (2019), arXiv:1810.04709 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  84. R. N. Mohapatra and V. L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. D 62, 063506 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0001362. · DOI
  85. R. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov, and V. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063002 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0111381. · DOI
  86. D. E. Kaplan, G. Z. Krnjaic, K. R. Rehermann, and C. M. Wells, JCAP 05, 021 (2010), arXiv:0909.0753 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  87. F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103515 (2013), arXiv:1209.5752 [astro- ph.CO]. · DOI
  88. J. M. Cline, Z. Liu, G. Moore, and W. Xue, Phys. Rev. D 89, 043514 (2014), arXiv:1311.6468 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  89. R. Foot, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430013 (2014), arXiv:1401.3965 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  90. K. K. Boddy, M. Kaplinghat, A. Kwa, and A. H. G. Peter, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123017 (2016), arXiv:1609.03592 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  91. J. M. Cline, Z. Liu, G. Moore, and W. Xue, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015023 (2014), arXiv:1312.3325 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  92. K. K. Boddy, J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and T. M. P. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 89, 115017 (2014), arXiv:1402.3629 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  93. X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 041101 (2020), arXiv:1901.00075 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  94. X. Chu, C. Garcia-Cely, and H. Murayama, JCAP 06, 043 (2020), arXiv:1908.06067 [hep-ph]. · DOI
  95. Q. He, H. Li, R. Li, C. S. Frenk, M. Schaller, D. Barnes, Y. BahÃľ, S. T. Kay, L. Gao, and C. D. Vecchia, (2019), arXiv:1907.01680 [astro-ph.CO]. · arXiv
  96. M. Sereno, C. Giocoli, S. Ettori, and L. Moscardini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449, 2024 (2015), arXiv:1410.4568 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  97. D. J. Barnes, S. T. Kay, Y. M. Bahé, C. Dalla Vecchia, I. G. McCarthy, J. Schaye, R. G. Bower, A. Jenkins, P. A. Thomas, M. Schaller, R. A. Crain, T. Theuns, and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 1088 (2017), arXiv:1703.10907 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  98. Y. M. Bahé, D. J. Barnes, C. Dalla Vecchia, S. T. Kay, S. D. M. White, I. G. McCarthy, J. Schaye, R. G. Bower, R. A. Crain, T. Theuns, A. Jenkins, S. L. McGee, M. Schaller, P. A. Thomas, and J. W. Trayford, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, 4186 (2017), arXiv:1703.10610 [astro-ph.GA]. · DOI
  99. A. F. J. Moffat, A&A 3, 455 (1969).
  100. M. Postman et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 199, 25 (2012), arXiv:1106.3328 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  101. V. Springel, S. D. M. White, G. Tormen, and G. Kauffmann, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 328, 726 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0012055 [astro-ph]. · DOI
  102. D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor, and E. Tittley, Science 347, 1462 (2015), arXiv:1503.07675 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI · Paper page
  103. D. Harvey, F. Courbin, J. P. Kneib, and I. G. McCarthy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 472, 1972 (2017), arXiv:1703.07365 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  104. D. Harvey, A. Robertson, R. Massey, and I. G. McCarthy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488, 1572 (2019), arXiv:1812.06981 [astro-ph.CO]. · DOI
  105. D. Gerosa and M. Vallisneri, J. Open Source Softw. 2, 222 (2017). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sagunski, L., Gad-Nasr, S., Colquhoun, B., Robertson, A., & Tulin, S.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2021-01-14
Volume
2021
Issue
01
Pages
024-024
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W3036358843
Cited by
128
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1607611)
  • Aspen Center for Physics (PHY1607611, 1607611)
  • Compute Canada
  • Western Canada Research Grid
  • European Commission (776247)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KA 4662/1-1)
  • Compute Ontario
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
self-interacting dark matter, velocity-dependent cross section, galaxy groups, galaxy clusters, Jeans analysis, adiabatic contraction, strong gravitational lensing, weak gravitational lensing, stellar kinematics, halo density profiles, mock simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review