The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloud fragmentation and stellar masses
Abstract
Theoretical arguments and numerical simulations both suggest that a star-forming cloud generally collapses to a flattened or filamentary configuration before fragmenting, and that fragmentation occurs as a result of the gravitational instability of the resulting layer or filament. A number of existing and new results for the stability of polytropic sheets, discs, and filaments are collected in this paper, and critical lengths and masses are derived for a variety of values of the polytropic exponent. The critical mass varies as T2/µ where T is the temperature and µ the surface density of the fragmenting cloud; the numerical coefficient is approximately the same for both sheets and filaments. Rotation and magnetic fields tend to inhibit fragmentation, but they do not fundamentally change the characteristic length and mass scales involved. The predictions of these stability analyses agree satisfactorily with the results of numerical simulations of the fragmentation of discs and filaments. The predicted critical masses in some well-studied regions of star formation also agree with the typical masses of the observed dense cloud clumps, and, in order of magnitude, with the masses of the young stars present. Differences in the observed fragment masses in different regions can be understood as due primarily to differences in the gas temperature, which is the dominant parameter controlling the mass scale for fragmentation. Fragmentation to smaller masses is likely to continue during the early stages of cloud evolution when the temperature decreases with increasing density, but it becomes less likely and may stop altogether when the temperature reaches its minimum value; this may produce a peak in the stellar initial mass function at the corresponding mass. The typical stellar mass should then increase strongly with increasing minimum cloud temperature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation
Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 · Cited by 1,248
The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Könyves, V., André, P., Men’shchikov, A., Palmeirim, P., Arzoumanian, D., Schneider, N., Roy, A., Didelon, P., Maury, A., Shimajiri, Y., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525861 · Cited by 486
The Birth Environment of the Solar System
Adams, F. C. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 · Cited by 464
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, R. B.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-06-01
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-398
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1977111510
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloud fragmentation and stellar masses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/214.3.379
- The paper
- Larson, R. B. (1985). Cloud fragmentation and stellar masses. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/214.3.379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.