The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering in real space and in redshift space
Open accessAbstract
Peculiar velocities distort the clustering pattern in red shift space on all scales. Four consequences of this are: (i) The acceleration vector derived by summing the inverse squared redshifts of galaxies differs significantly from the true acceleration even in linear theory. Estimates of Ω obtained in this manner are only reliable for small Ω. (ii) The power spectrum of large-scale clustering has a quadrupole anisotropy, providing a way to estimate Ω. We calculated, for various assumed power spectra, the line-of-sight correlation function in redshift space, ξυ. We find that ξυ may display a strong anticorrelation feature that has no counterpart in real space. (iii) The density contrast of the local supercluster will appear enhanced in redshift space. Using a simple infall model (with Ω = l), we simulate the Shapley–Ames catalogue. For an infall velocity around 350 km s–1, the apparent density is similar to that observed, so the data do not require Ω⪡ 1, or biasing on large scales. (iv) Turnaround is estimated to occur at a radius ≃1500 km s–1 from a rich cluster, resulting in large transverse features of this scale. Since the velocity field is apparently very coherent, high density caustic surfaces must result. Guided by the appearance of the spherical model, we argue that the shell-like structures seen in some recent redshift surveys are most naturally interpreted as these caustics, rather than as the result of energetic explosions. The model also shows the apparent falling velocity dispersion with radius that is often seen in rich clusters, and suggests that the interpretation of this in terms of equilibrium models is inappropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe
(2007) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73478-9_2 · Cited by 3,219
Cited by
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Beutler, F., Blake, C., Colless, M., Jones, D. H., Staveley-Smith, L., Campbell, L., Parker, Q., Saunders, W., & Watson, F. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19250.x · Cited by 2,590
“The model of linear redshift space distortions introduced by Kaiser (1987) is based on the plane parallel approximation.”
MethodAlam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2128759530
- Cited by
- 2,750
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering in real space and in redshift space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/227.1.1
- The paper
- Kaiser, N. (1987). Clustering in real space and in redshift space. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/227.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.