Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution

Open access
Coles, Peter, Jones, Bernard·1991·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We discuss the use of a lognormal (LN) random field as a model for the distribution of matter in the Universe. We find a number of reasons why this should be a plausible approximation to the distribution of density irregularities obtained by evolving from Gaussian initial conditions. Unlike straightforward linear theory, the model always has |$\rho\gt0$| but is arbitrarily close to the Gaussian at early times. It has the added advantage that, like the Gaussian model, all its statistical properties can be formulated in terms of one covariance function. A number of interesting and important difficulties with the statistical treatment of density perturbations are revealed by an analysis of this model. In particular, the LN model is not completely specified by its moments. We explain why this could be true for the actual matter field. We also show that the usual method of representing the three- and four-point correlation functions of galaxies, in terms of the parameters Q and R, is not useful for discriminating between Gaussian and non-Gaussian fluctuations, and propose better parameterizations in terms of the skewness and kurtosis of the three- and four-point distributions, respectively. Other characteristics of the model, such as topology (genus curves, etc.), multifractal behaviour, void probabilities and biasing (behaviour of ‘peaks’ relative to background fluctuations) are also discussed. The model also provides a way of checking the consistency of treatments of large-scale streaming motions in the Universe by allowing us to determine the scale at which linear theory cannot be accurate for both the matter and velocity fields. We discuss a possible model for the number-count distribution of galaxies, based on the LN distribution but allowing for discreteness effects which can make the distribution of log n appear non-Gaussian, and show how to construct Monte-Carlo simulations of point patterns (in one-, two, or three-dimensions) which contain correlations of all orders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/248.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Coles, P., & Jones, B.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1991-01
Volume
248
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2015920480
Cited by
598
References
0
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/248.1.1
The paper
Coles, P., & Jones, B. (1991). A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/248.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.