Cited by 1,846Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample

Open access
Percival, Will J., Reid, Beth A., Eisenstein, Daniel J., Bahcall, Neta A., Budavari, Tamas, Frieman, Joshua A., Fukugita, Masataka, Gunn, James E. +20 more·2010·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The spectroscopic Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 7 (DR7) galaxy sample represents the final set of galaxies observed using the original SDSS target selection criteria. We analyse the clustering of galaxies within this sample, including both the luminous red galaxy and main samples, and also include the 2-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey data. In total, this sample comprises 893 319 galaxies over 9100 deg2. Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) are observed in power spectra measured for different slices in redshift; this allows us to constrain the distance–redshift relation at multiple epochs. We achieve a distance measure at redshift z= 0.275, of rs(zd)/DV(0.275) = 0.1390 ± 0.0037 (2.7 per cent accuracy), where rs(zd) is the comoving sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch, DV(z) ≡[(1 +z)2D2Acz/H(z)]1/3, DA(z) is the angular diameter distance and H(z) is the Hubble parameter. We find an almost independent constraint on the ratio of distances DV(0.35)/DV(0.2) = 1.736 ± 0.065, which is consistent at the 1.1σ level with the best-fitting Λ cold dark matter model obtained when combining our z= 0.275 distance constraint with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 5-year (WMAP5) data. The offset is similar to that found in previous analyses of the SDSS DR5 sample, but the discrepancy is now of lower significance, a change caused by a revised error analysis and a change in the methodology adopted, as well as the addition of more data. Using WMAP5 constraints on Ωbh2 and Ωch2, and combining our BAO distance measurements with those from the Union supernova sample, places a tight constraint on Ωm= 0.286 ± 0.018 and H0= 68.2 ± 2.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 that is robust to allowing Ωk≠ 0 and w≠−1. This result is independent of the behaviour of dark energy at redshifts greater than those probed by the BAO and supernova measurements. Combining these data sets with the full WMAP5 likelihood constraints provides tight constraints on both Ωk=−0.006 ± 0.008 and w=−0.97 ± 0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15812.x

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Colless M., et al., 2003, astro-ph/0306581 · arXiv
  2. Gaztanaga E., Cabre A., Hui L., 2008, [[arXiv:0807.3551]] · arXiv
  3. Glazebrook K., et al., 2007, ASP conference series Vol 379, 72, [[astro-ph/0701876]] · arXiv
  4. Kazin E., et al., 2009, ApJ submitted, arXiv:0908.2598 · arXiv
  5. Reid B., et al., 2009, MNRAS submitted, [[arXiv:0907.1659]] · arXiv
  6. Rozo E., et al., 2009, [[arXiv:0902.3702]] · arXiv
  7. Sanchez A.G., Crocce M., Cabre A., Baugh C.M., Gaztanaga E., 2009, MNRAS submitted, [[arXiv:0901.2570]] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Percival, W. J., Reid, B. A., Eisenstein, D. J., Bahcall, N. A., Budavari, T., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G. R., Kron, R. G., Loveday, J., Lupton, R. H., McKay, T. A., Meiksin, A., Nichol, R. C., Pope, A. C., Schlegel, D. J., Schneider, D. P., Spergel, D. N., Stoughton, C., Strauss, M. A., Szalay, A. S., Tegmark, M., Vogeley, M. S., Weinberg, D. H., York, D. G., & Zehavi, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
  • Institute for Cosmic Ray Research (JP)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Royal Observatory (GB)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Percival, Will J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
401
Issue
4
Pages
2148-2168
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2113869105
Cited by
1,846
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 216 · 2012: 256
FWCI
94.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC02-07CH11359, DE‐AC02‐07CH11359)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX07AC51G)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Princeton University
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Drexel University
  • Universität Basel
  • University of Portsmouth
  • New Mexico State University
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • University of Cambridge
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/G001979/1, ST/H00131X/1, PP/E001033/1, ST/H008578/1, ST/I003088/1, ST/F002858/1, ST/F002335/1)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20540255)
  • U.S. Naval Observatory
  • Fermilab (DEAC02-07CH11359)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
baryon acoustic oscillations, galaxy clustering, SDSS DR7, luminous red galaxies, 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey, distance-redshift relation, sound horizon, angular diameter distance, Hubble parameter, matter density parameter, dark energy, cosmological constraints, WMAP5, dark matter density parameter, spatial curvature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review