The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The distortion of distant galaxy images by large-scale structure
Abstract
Inhomogeneity in the distribution of mass in the universe on scales ≲ 100 Mpc can generate a coherent shear distortion or polarization of the images of background galaxies. This distortion may be measurable over patches of the sky up to a few square degrees in size. If this distortion is measured, or conversely, if its magnitude is limited, it should help us understand the degree to which luminosity traces the underlying mass over cosmological scales. A prescription is given for quantifying the galaxy distortion and a propagation equation for its evolution in an inhomogeneous universe is derived. The creation of shear by inhomogeneity is illustrated using model kinematic universes comprising random distributions of point masses, spheres and circular discs designed to simulate the superclusters, voids and ‘walls’ reported in galaxy velocity surveys. Using these simulations, we estimate that an rms induced ellipticity of |$|p|_\text {rms}$| ˜ |$0.2\Omega_\text {LSS}$| (where |$\Omega_\text {LSS}$| is the fraction of the mass of the universe clustered on the large scale) will be produced. The angular correlation length is ˜ 1.6°. In an alternative prescription, the universe is modelled using a power spectrum of density fluctuations and the mean correlation function is computed both analytically and numerically. In these simulations we find that |$|p|_\text {rms}$| ˜0.02 for biased cold dark matter models of an Einslein–De Sitter universe, and the effective correlation length is |$\theta_{1/2}$| ˜ 0.5ΰ. For a hot dark matter dominated universe the correlation length is |$\theta_{1/2}$| ˜ 0.7ΰ. The faint, blue galaxies discovered by Tyson and collaborators have a surface density of ˜ 3 × 105 deg−2 and should provide an ideal set of sources for measuring this effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
Mellier, Y. (1999) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.127 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Blandford, R. D., Saust, A. B., Brainerd, T. G., & Villumsen, J. V.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-08-15
- Volume
- 251
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 600-627
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2063035334
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The distortion of distant galaxy images by large-scale structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/251.4.600
- The paper
- Blandford, R. D., Saust, A. B., Brainerd, T. G., & Villumsen, J. V. (1991). The distortion of distant galaxy images by large-scale structure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/251.4.600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.